Woche 9
Intercultural Business Communication
Intercultural Business Communication
Fichier Détails
Cartes-fiches | 30 |
---|---|
Langue | Deutsch |
Catégorie | Gestion d'entreprise |
Niveau | Université |
Crée / Actualisé | 14.01.2024 / 15.01.2024 |
Lien de web |
https://card2brain.ch/box/20240114_woche_9_T20L
|
Intégrer |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20240114_woche_9_T20L/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
Communication across Cultures:
Low Context Communication:
High Context Communication;
- Low Context Communication is precise, simple and clear. Messages are expressed abd understood as they are.
- High Context Communication: Sophisticated, nuanced and layered. Messages are bot: Spoken and read between the lines. Messages are often implied (inlcuded) but no plainly expressed
Communication can be divided in direct and indirect communication:
- Direct communication has low context. It is clearly and unambigously
- Indirect communicaton has high contex
Communication - Strategy/behavior when working with High Context Communicator:
- Listen more to what is meant, not only what its been said
- "Listen" to how the message was given (Body language) - Ask more clarifying questions
- Ask open-ended questions (cant be answered with yes or no)
Communication - Strategy/behavior when working with Low Context Communicator:
- Be as clear as possible, represent your opinions transparently
- Clarify your meaning if something could be understood in a number of ways,
- Repeat what you understand or what has been discussed / Summary of keypoints welcomed
- Dont red "between the lines" - If you are not sure, ask
- Being right > Being polite
Communictaion - Name 5 countrys with a high context communication and 5 with low context communication
High Context: Japan, Korea, Indonesia, China, Saudi Arabia
Low Context: USA, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Germany
Why does f.e. USA has such a low and Japan a high context communication?
Historicaly: High context culture tend to have a long history and usually relationship-oriented societies
On the other side USA wirh only a few hundred years of history, people all with different backround and languages - Explicit communciation neede.
Negative Feedback - Can be divided in direct or indirect negative feedback. Describe the characteristics of them:
Direct negative feedback: Frankly and honestly. Negative message stands alone. Crticism may be given to an individual in front of a group
Indirect negative feedback: Provided softly and discretly. Positive messages are used to wrap negatives. Criticism is only given in private.
Negative feedback: Name 5 countries with direct/indirect negative feedback:
Direct negative feedback: Israel, Russia, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, France
Indirect negative feedback: Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Korea
Persuasion: Principles-first / Application-first:
Principles first (Top-down-Approach): Begins with a fact, statement or opinion and later add concept. Begin message/report with summary or bullet points. Concrete, practical discussions. Philosophical discussions avoided in business environment.
Application first (Bottom-up-Approach): Develop theory/complex concept before presenting a fact or a opnion. Build a theoretical arguement before moving on to a conclusion.
5 countrys Priciples First/Application First:
Principles First: France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Germany
Application First: USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Netherlands
Describe 5 Persuading Strategys:
- Raise the team's awareness by explaining the scale. Use case studies and practical examples
- Bulid “cultural bridges”. Can be very helpful at the team level.
- Understand and adapt to one another’s behaviors
- Patience and flexibility are key. Cross-cultural effectiveness takes time.
- When dealing with multicultural teams, cycle between theoretical principles and practical examples.
Leadership: Describe Egalitarian and Hierarchical Leadership:
Egalitarian:
- Low hierarchical distances
- Flat organizations structures
- Open communication/dynamic working environment
Hierarchical:
- High hierarchical distance between boss and subordinate
- Status important
- Fixed structure, communication follow hiereachical lines
5 Egalitarian/ 5 Hierarchical Countrys:
Egalitarian: Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Australia, Israel
Hierarchical: Japan, Nigeria, Korea, India, China, Saudi Arabia
Interaction Awareness when working with Ealitarian/Hierarchical cultures:
Characteristics of Egalitarian Cultures:
- Its ok to disagree with the boss openly
- People are more likely to move to action without getting the ok from boss
- Less focus on matching hierarchical levels in meetings / No specific oreder in seating or speaking.
- Its ok to email/call people several levels above you
Characteristics of Hierarchical Cultures:
- Effort to defer (beugen) to the chefs opinion. especially in public
- People get boss approval before moving to action
- If the send their boss, you (should) send your boss. Seated and spoken in in ordered position
- Communication in hierarchical lines
Leadership strategies when working with Egalitarian/Hierarchicals:
Egalitarians:
- Go directly to the source. No need to bother the boss
- Skiping hieracrchical levels probably wont be a problem/think twice if copying the boss
Hierarchicals:
- Communicate with person on your level to get explicit permission to hop to another level
- If you email to someone lower, copy the boss
Egalitarians leading Hierachicals:
- Have your subordinates bainstorm (then report ideas back to you)
- Prime meetings with clear instructions in advance (format, structure, agenda)
- invite people to speak up (Moderate the meeting)
Hierarchicals leading Egalitarians:
- management by objectives
- Clear, specific objective with link to rewards
- 12 months objectives, check progress periodically
Deciding: Consensual vs Top Down
Top-down:
- Decisions are made by individuals (normally boss)
- Top down decision making: Short process of discussion (boss deceides), longer implementation process (possible revision, change of decision)
Consensual:
- Decisions are made in groups through multi-voice agreement
- Consensual decision making: Longer discussion phase/Exchange, short implementation (without discussion)
Name 3 of each contry: Top down/consensual:
Top down:
- Nigeria, China, India
Consenal:
- Japan, Sweden, Nedtherlands
Best Practice for Multiculutel Teams:
- Explicitly discuss and agree upon a decision-making approach.
- Define whether the decision will be made by vote or by the boss after a team discussion.
- Determine whether 100% agreement is needed.
- Decide whether a deadline (for making the decision) is necessary.
- Define how much flexibility there will be for changing a decision after the deadline.
Trusting: Task-based vs Reationship-based
Taskt based (Cognitiv Trust):
- Trust trough business-realted activities
- Built and dropped easily, based on the situation
- You do good work consistently, you are reliable, I enjoy workin with you -I trust you
Relationship-based (Affective Trust):
- Trust trough sharing meals, drinks, and chat ovef coffee (friendship, emotional closeness)
- Work relationships build up slowly over long period
- I've seen you are at a deeper level, i know others who trust you, I trust you
5 Countrys that are Taks-based/Relationship-based:
Task based:
- USA
- Denmark
- Netherlands
- Germany
- UK
Relationship based:
- Saudi-Arabia
- Nigeria
- India
- China
- Thailand
Communication in contetxt: Context poor/Context rich
Context poor communication: E-Mail (actual information sharin
Context rich communication: Peronal meeting, Videocall (Discussions, debates with sensitives issues)
Disagreeing: Confrontation / Non- Confrontation:
Confrontation:
- Disagreement/debates are positive for team organization
- open confrontation has no negative impact on relationships
- Isarael, France, Germany, Russia, Denmark)
Non-Confrontation:
- Disagreement/debate are negativce for team organization
- Open confrontation is inappropriate and will break harmony/negatively impact on relationship
- Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Ghana, China
Strategies for disagreeing with no confrontation:
- If your the boss, consider skipping the meeting (others may not feel comptirable disagreeing with you)
- Avoid giving yout opinion first
- Depersonalize disagreement
- Give subordinates time to prepare their opinions
Scheduling: Linear Time/Flexible Time
Linear time: One thing at the time, projetc steps in sequental fashion (Germany, Switzerland, japan)
Flexible time: Many thins at once, project steps in fluid manner (Saudi-Arabia, India, China, Nigeria)
3 Time orientations:
past orientation: Characterized by an awareness of tradition, history, respect for the elders
Present orientation: Focus on action and doing rather than thinking and being
Future orientation: Effort on what it comes next, planing and organizing is important