Woche 9

Intercultural Business Communication

Intercultural Business Communication


Kartei Details

Karten 30
Sprache Deutsch
Kategorie BWL
Stufe Universität
Erstellt / Aktualisiert 14.01.2024 / 15.01.2024
Weblink
https://card2brain.ch/box/20240114_woche_9_T20L
Einbinden
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20240114_woche_9_T20L/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Communication across Cultures:

Low Context Communication:

High Context Communication;

  • Low Context Communication is precise, simple and clear. Messages are expressed abd understood as they are. 

 

  • High Context Communication: Sophisticated, nuanced and layered. Messages are bot: Spoken and read between the lines. Messages are often implied (inlcuded) but no plainly expressed

Communication can be divided in direct and indirect communication:

  • Direct communication has low context. It is clearly and unambigously
  • Indirect communicaton has high contex

Communication - Strategy/behavior when working with High Context Communicator:

  • Listen more to what is meant, not only what its been said
  • "Listen" to how the message was given (Body language) - Ask more clarifying questions
  • Ask open-ended questions (cant be answered with yes or no)

Communication - Strategy/behavior when working with Low Context Communicator:

  • Be as clear as possible, represent your opinions transparently
  • Clarify your meaning if something could be understood in a number of ways, 
  • Repeat what you understand or what has been discussed / Summary of keypoints welcomed
  • Dont red "between the lines" - If you are not sure, ask
  • Being right > Being polite

Communictaion - Name 5 countrys with a high context communication and 5 with low context communication

High Context: Japan, Korea, Indonesia, China, Saudi Arabia

Low Context: USA, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Germany

Why does f.e. USA has such a low and Japan a high context communication?

Historicaly: High context culture tend to have a long history and usually relationship-oriented societies

On the other side USA wirh only a few hundred years of history, people all with different backround and languages - Explicit communciation neede.

 

Negative Feedback - Can be divided in direct or indirect negative feedback. Describe the characteristics of them:

Direct negative feedback: Frankly and honestly. Negative message stands alone. Crticism may be given to an individual in front of a group

Indirect negative feedback: Provided softly and discretly. Positive messages are used to wrap negatives. Criticism is only given in private.

Negative feedback: Name 5 countries with direct/indirect negative feedback:

Direct negative feedback: Israel, Russia, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, France

Indirect negative feedback: Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Korea

 

Evaluting Strategys:

      

Persuasion: Principles-first / Application-first:

Principles first (Top-down-Approach): Begins with a fact, statement or opinion and later add concept. Begin message/report with summary or bullet points. Concrete, practical discussions. Philosophical discussions avoided in business environment.

Application first (Bottom-up-Approach): Develop theory/complex concept before presenting a fact or a opnion. Build a theoretical arguement before moving on to a conclusion.

5 countrys Priciples First/Application First:

Principles First: France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Germany

Application First: USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Netherlands

Describe 5 Persuading Strategys:

  1. Raise the team's awareness by explaining the scale. Use case studies and practical examples
  2. Bulid “cultural bridges”. Can be very helpful at the team level. 
  3. Understand and adapt to one another’s behaviors
  4. Patience and flexibility are key. Cross-cultural effectiveness takes time. 
  5. When dealing with multicultural teams, cycle between theoretical principles and practical examples.

Leadership: Describe Egalitarian and Hierarchical Leadership:

Egalitarian:

  • Low hierarchical distances
  • Flat organizations structures
  • Open communication/dynamic working environment

Hierarchical:

  • High hierarchical distance between boss and subordinate
  • Status important
  • Fixed structure, communication follow hiereachical lines

5 Egalitarian/ 5 Hierarchical Countrys:

 

Egalitarian: Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Australia, Israel

Hierarchical: Japan, Nigeria, Korea, India, China, Saudi Arabia

Interaction Awareness when working with Ealitarian/Hierarchical cultures:

Characteristics of Egalitarian Cultures:

  • Its ok to disagree with the boss openly
  • People are more likely to move to action without getting the ok from boss
  • Less focus on matching hierarchical levels in meetings / No specific oreder in seating or speaking.
  • Its ok to email/call people several levels above you

Characteristics of Hierarchical Cultures:

  • Effort to defer (beugen) to the chefs opinion. especially in public
  • People get boss approval before moving to action
  • If the send their boss, you (should) send your boss. Seated and spoken in in ordered position
  • Communication in hierarchical lines

 

Leadership strategies when working with Egalitarian/Hierarchicals:

Egalitarians: 

  • Go directly to the source. No need to bother the boss
  • Skiping hieracrchical levels probably wont be a problem/think twice if copying the boss

Hierarchicals:

  • Communicate with person on your level to get explicit permission to hop to another level
  • If you email to someone lower, copy the boss

Egalitarians leading Hierachicals:

  • Have your subordinates bainstorm (then report ideas back to you)
  • Prime meetings with clear instructions in advance (format, structure, agenda)
  • invite people to speak up (Moderate the meeting)

Hierarchicals leading Egalitarians:

  • management by objectives
  • Clear, specific objective with link to rewards
  • 12 months objectives, check progress periodically

Deciding: Consensual vs Top Down

Top-down: 

  • Decisions are made by individuals (normally boss)
  • Top down decision making: Short process of discussion (boss deceides), longer implementation process (possible revision, change of decision)

Consensual:

  • Decisions are made in groups through multi-voice agreement
  • Consensual decision making: Longer discussion phase/Exchange, short implementation (without discussion)

Name 3 of each contry: Top down/consensual:

Top down:

  • Nigeria, China, India

Consenal:

  • Japan, Sweden, Nedtherlands

Best Practice for Multiculutel Teams:

  1. Explicitly discuss and agree upon a decision-making approach.
  2. Define whether the decision will be made by vote or by the boss after a team discussion.
  3. Determine whether 100% agreement is needed.
  4. Decide whether a deadline (for making the decision) is necessary.
  5. Define how much flexibility there will be for changing a decision after the deadline.

Trusting: Task-based vs Reationship-based

Taskt based (Cognitiv Trust):

  • Trust trough business-realted activities
  • Built and dropped easily, based on the situation
  • You do good work consistently, you are reliable, I enjoy workin with you -I  trust you

Relationship-based (Affective Trust):

  • Trust trough sharing meals, drinks, and chat ovef coffee (friendship, emotional closeness)
  • Work relationships build up slowly over long period
  • I've seen you are at a deeper level, i know others who trust you, I trust you

5 Countrys that are Taks-based/Relationship-based:

 

Task based:

  • USA
  • Denmark
  • Netherlands
  • Germany
  • UK

Relationship based:

  • Saudi-Arabia
  • Nigeria
  • India
  • China
  • Thailand

Communication in contetxt: Context poor/Context rich

Context poor communication: E-Mail (actual information sharin

Context rich communication: Peronal meeting, Videocall (Discussions, debates with sensitives issues)

Disagreeing: Confrontation / Non- Confrontation:

 

Confrontation: 

  • Disagreement/debates are positive for team organization
  • open confrontation has no negative impact on relationships
  • Isarael, France, Germany, Russia, Denmark)

Non-Confrontation:

  • Disagreement/debate are negativce for team organization
  • Open confrontation is inappropriate and will break harmony/negatively impact on relationship
  • Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Ghana, China

Strategies for disagreeing with no confrontation:

  • If your the boss, consider skipping the meeting (others may not feel comptirable disagreeing with you)
  • Avoid giving yout opinion first
  • Depersonalize disagreement
  • Give subordinates time to prepare their opinions

Scheduling: Linear Time/Flexible Time

Linear time: One thing at the time, projetc steps in sequental fashion (Germany, Switzerland, japan)

Flexible time: Many thins at once, project steps in fluid manner (Saudi-Arabia, India, China, Nigeria)

3 Time orientations:

past orientation: Characterized by an awareness of tradition, history, respect for the elders

Present orientation: Focus on action and doing  rather than thinking and being

Future orientation: Effort on what it comes next, planing and organizing is important

Erin Meyers Country Mapping Tool:

Country Map Example: