Dialects In Contact 1-7, 9-11
Dialects In Contact
Dialects In Contact
Fichier Détails
Cartes-fiches | 181 |
---|---|
Langue | English |
Niveau | Université |
Crée / Actualisé | 17.06.2011 / 27.05.2012 |
Lien de web |
https://card2brain.ch/box/dialects_in_contact_17_911
|
Intégrer |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/dialects_in_contact_17_911/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
(Supralocalisation)
Definition
=Regional Dialect levelling "above the local", Megadialects.
- ling. variants with a wider socio-spatial currency substitute locally specific forms.
>PROCESS is result of mobility + dialect contact
(Supralocalisation)
examples
-"North" (Watt & Milroy 1999)
-"Estuary English" (Przedlacka 2002)
-"Central North" (Mathisen 1999)
(Supralocalisation)
"North"
(Watt & Milroy 1999)
tendency towards convergence in northern English dialects.
(Supralocalisation)
"Estuary English"
(Przedlacka 2002)
Southeast of England
(Supralocalisation)
"Central North"
(Mathisen 1999)
Birmingham + Northwest of England
(Supralocalisation)
Milroy et al 1994
Supralocalisation of /t/ in Newcastle
(Supralocalisation)
/t/ in Newcastle
(Milroy et al 1994)
-trad. glottal stop + t is dying out
-supralocal feature glottal stop is increasing
(Supralocalisation)
Rejuvenation of [ng] in Newcastle
-used most in formal styles of young middle class women
-supralocal form that is spreading, spoken by middle class, female speakers
>female + middle class speakers are leading supralocal changes
(Supralocalisation)
Watts 2006
Cheshire
-looked at TH fronting: widespread but not in Cheshire
-looked at unstressed + stressed (ing): stressed form dominant
(Supralocalisation)
Estuary English:
Characterization
-mix of standard + London English
-extreme media hype
-melting pot since WW2: economic strength
(Supralocalisation)
Estuary English:
Evidence
-sth going on, but far from focussed
(Supralocalisation)
Estuary English:
Studys
-were done mostly by non-England-scholars
(Supralocalisation)
Estuary English:
Conclusion
-no huge convergence
-more evidence is needed because of little data
(Supralocalisation)
4 Issues
1. it's not new (but perhaps more extensive than ever before, Ellis 1889)
2. it's not complete, it's a process in progress
3. happening why? regional internal contact + mobilities?
4. takes spotlight away from region internal variation + diversity
(Supralocalisation)
Ellis 1889
found beginning of Supralocalisation:
-shifting population
-mobility
>trend/direction can be seen, but not a complete process
(Supralocalisation)
Mobility/Commuting
-short distance travel (less than 5km)
-upper middle class ppl commute
-mobility geographically restricted
-relocation
(Supralocalisation)
Other mobilities
-expansion in uptake of higher levels of education
-increases in public + private transportation
-geogr. reorientation of consumption behaviours > large shopping-malls outside of town
-increase in mobile + flexible working
-shift 1+2 > 3rd sector employment
-moving home
-increasing geogr. elasticity of family ties
(Supralocalisation)
Allen et al 1998
South East
(Supralocalisation)
South East
-human behaviour helped making that region
-SE is incredibly socially diverse
>socially divergent but linguistically convergent population > STRANGE!
(Supralocalisation)
Heterogeneous homogenization
1. commuting, counterurbanisation
2. Boundaries
3. restricted age + gender mobilities
(Supralocalisation)
Heterogeneous homogenization:commuting, counterurbanisation
-middle class
-gap between rich-poor
-globalization > look beyond nation state (e.g. Norwich disarticulates itself from the SE)
(Supralocalisation)
Heterogeneous homogenization:
boundaries
-sharpening of boundaries between areas in some places
-e.g. "bath vowel": Northeners adopt some new features but retain their bath feature + sharpen the boundary
(Supralocalisation)
Heterogeneous homogenization:
restricted age + gender mobilities
(sociolinguists)
-kids push linguistic change but their mobility is restricted (school)
-grown up middle class ppl don't have that much influence on language
-adults are not good accommodators, their kids more important
-women's social networkss: more contact with wider range of ppl > more likely to be influenced =>why women lead supralocal language change
-3rd sector=more female + more mobile
(Supralocalisation)
Conclusion
-Evidence that local dialects are dying out > features with wider currency
-difficult to tell young ppl's geogr. origin
-progress, rather than complete + barriers (boundaries)
(Supralocalisation)
Mobility conclusion
-mobility is socially diverse
-of many different kinds
-most affecting rural areas
-middle class speakers + their communities
(Supralocalisation)
Attitudes + Identities
-choice not sounding too local but also not disassociating themselves
-socially differentiated
(1st Dialect acquisition)
research themes
-on non-natives in dialectology
-on (recently arrived) immigrants in dialectology
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Horvath 1985
-AusE in Sydney
-included Italian, Greeks + Anglos
-wide range of vowels + consonant variables
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Horvath 1985:
Adults
-Anglos = least standard adults
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Horvath 1985:
Teenagers
-most non-standard varieties by Anglos
-most standard v. by Anglos + Italians
>Anglos
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Horvath 1985:
Conclusion
>to understand dynamics, ethnic minorities hat to be taken into consideration!
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Labov 1972
2nd generation speakers distance themselves from low prestige patterns of their parents to reach for native status
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Fox 2007
Tower Hamlets, interethnic transmission of language change
-SE English urban varieties in Inner London
-densely populated, largely multicultural
>white adolescent girls + boys with bangladeshi boys
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Fox 2007:
Results
-simplifying system
-glottal stops replace other features, spreads slowly to white population
-social network ties seem to be responsible for changes
>look at surrounding dialect, not picked up RP
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Bedford
-Italians in Bedford
-Bedford = highly ethnically mixed
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Bedford 2004
-direct method data collection
-14 young
-face2face interaction
informal conversations
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Bedford 2006
-10 Italian businesses
-Ethnographic recordings
-20h of naturally occuring workplace language + interaction
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Bedford: Summary
-1st gen: L2 varieties of English
-2nd gen: behave like Anglos
-3rd gen: similar to Bangladeshi in London
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Vietnamese English
-t/d deletion
(1st Dialect acquisition)
Factors for Manchester-like pronunciation
-length of residence
-level of English
-having an English partner
-attitudes towards Manchester
-use of Polish at work
>no difference if partner is from Manchester or not