Cambridge CSR
8 week course
8 week course
Kartei Details
Karten | 78 |
---|---|
Sprache | English |
Kategorie | VWL |
Stufe | Universität |
Erstellt / Aktualisiert | 24.04.2021 / 19.05.2021 |
Weblink |
https://card2brain.ch/box/20210424_cambridge_csr
|
Einbinden |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20210424_cambridge_csr/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
Lernkarteien erstellen oder kopieren
Mit einem Upgrade kannst du unlimitiert Lernkarteien erstellen oder kopieren und viele Zusatzfunktionen mehr nutzen.
Melde dich an, um alle Karten zu sehen.
“Increasingly, we see evidence and acknowledgement that climate change presents financial risk to the global economy. According to the United Nations, delays in tackling this issue could cost companies nearly US $1.2 trillion over the next 15 years” (TCFD, 2019).
An increasing amount of evidence suggests that businesses recognised as sustainable increasingly outperform their peers financially (Barnett & Salomon, 2011; Bonini & Swartz, 2014; Whelan & Fink, 2016; Meaningful Brands, 2019).
na
What are science-based targets?
Science-based targets are those adopted by companies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with what the latest climate science says is necessary to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement — to limit global warming to well-below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C.
Stranded assets
“Stranded assets” are assets that have suffered from unanticipated or premature write-downs, devaluations, or conversion to liabilities (for example, oil and coal from divestment due to climate change considerations). This term could also apply to an asset that becomes obsolete or is no longer able to create value (for example equipment, buildings or degraded soil (in the case of an agricultural business).
The operational and strategic issues that need to be considered to understand a business’s resilience to sustainability challenges.
Circle
Strategic
- Brand and reputation - key stakeholder relations
- Business Model and propositions
- Stranded assets
Operational
- Productivity and employee engagement
- Operational disruption
- Input price rises (price volatility) and regulatory compliance costs
New concepts of value creation
Creating shared value is an example of an approach that seeks to connect social progress and business value. The purpose of shared value is for companies to find a way to turn social problems into business opportunities that help to solve these problems instead (Shared Value Initiative, 2016). Furthermore, it is about creating value for both the business (in the form of profits) and society (for example, through job creation, training and development initiatives). Shared value is not simply about “doing the right thing” by donating money to causes. It is a management strategy that aims to empower individuals and communities while simultaneously delivering on financial value for a business (Driffill, Hacking, & Styles, 2016)
built on trust between co and stakeholders
shared value -- business solve CSR challenges better by making profits
challenge for business to realize and understand volatiliy due to E and Social factors (systemic challenges)
How should co's rethink value?
Shifting corporate responsibility
- move to integrated reporting
- think about societal impact on value
Shared value
- shift debate to a source of competitive advantage
- opps in addressing societal problem (also ST to LT)
societal value proposition
philanthropy
CSR (manage risks)
Creating shared value (competitive advantage)
Creating shared value (CSV) versus CSR
CSR has an element of transfer of money, e.g. in fair trade you pay a farmer a fair price (paying more for the same thing, which according to Porter is not sustainable). With CSV you are improving the farmer, so that he can produce more efficiently.
CSV
= economic value for business and benefits for society
= Societal problems as bus. opps
= Consider core assets & expertise differently
= make the pie bigger
NOT shared values
NOT Giving back, philanthropy or CSR
NOT compliance
3 Levels of shared value
- Reconceive products and markets
- Redefine productivity in value chains
- Enable local cluster development
Examples of reconceiving products
1. AIA: Incentivizing good behavior by giving rewards leading to lower mortality rates and therefore smaller death benefits to be paid
2. Nestle: Train and equip farmers as suppliers
3. talent pool of jointly trained youth to offset low supply of educated employees
Finally, CSV was presented not as a redistribution approach, sharing value that has been already created by companies, but as an approach to expand the total pool of economic and social value.
Critic:
Instead of focusing on the inherent dilemmas and the inevitable trade-offs between economic and social value creation, they see CSV as an attempt to whitewash the problem of trade-offs and to disregard negative impacts of corporate activities. In focusing on win-win solutions and individual projects, CSV leads companies to concentrate on the easy wins, while leaving unresolved the deeper social issues to which they are connected. Corporate cherry picking and whitewashing, as suggested by CSV, is destined to lead to "islands of win-win in an ocean of unresolved E and S conflicts.
If we are honest, we have been living with the ambiguity created by the debate on the value of CSV for a long time. In lecturing to business people, we tend to stress the business case of sustainability and the corporate benefits of their social engagements, be it in the form of efficiency gains, reputational benefits or stronger market positions, because we know this relates to the world that they live in. In discussions with our academic peers, however, we freely discuss the limitations and shortcomings of such win-win approaches. We are fully aware of this inherent ambiguity and yet we realise that they both have their own truths.
4x Critices of CSV (Creating shared values)
1. Unoriginal / repackaging of strategic CSR etc.
2. Ignores tension between social and economic goals (ignore need of trade offs)
3. Naive about bus. compliance
4. Too narrow on island, not overall system. Cherry picking
It stands to reason that companies that pursue sustainability are more likely to develop innovative processes, products, and services to implement their sustainability strategies. This innovation results in outputs that offer new features and benefits, including the reduction of negative environmental and social impacts.
na
Key success factors of CSV
Clear business case
Proven model (to drive social case)
Internal champion to drive change
Our survey and subsequent interviews with business leaders tell us that many companies are deprioritizing innovation to concentrate on four things: shoring up their core business, pursuing known opportunity spaces, conserving cash and minimizing risk, and waiting until “there is more clarity.” However, we believe that, particularly in times of crisis more urgent actions to take include:
- adapting the core to meet shifting customer needs
- identifying and quickly addressing new opportunity areas being created by the changing landscape
- reevaluating the innovation initiative portfolio and ensuring resources are allocated appropriately
- building the foundation for postcrisis growth in order to remain competitive in the recovery period
Businesses can gain long-term advantages by understanding such shifts and the opportunities they present. In past crises, companies that invested in innovation delivered superior growth and performance postcrisis. Organizations that maintained their innovation focus through the 2009 financial crisis, for example, emerged stronger, outperforming the market average by more than 30 percent and continuing to deliver accelerated growth over the subsequent three to five years
Ten Tasks for economic leaders
Government
- measure right things and set right targets
- Align incentives (regulations, taxes) to support better outcomes
- Drive socially-useful innovation
Finance
- Ensure capital acts for LT
- Price Capital acc. to true costs of activities
- Innovate financial structures to better serve S business (society's interests)
Business
- Align org. purpose, strategy and business models
- set evidence based targets, measure and be transparent
- Embed S in practices and decisions
- Engage, collaborate and advocate change
3 main drivers from business perspective
1) Tax unfavorable impacts
2) Regulatory interventions of pricing mechanism
3) Increase transparency
CISL condensation of SDGs
outer ring REC: Resource security, Healthy Ecosystems, Climate stability
Inner (human) (Basic Wow). Basic Needs, Wellbeing, Decent work
Economy
Finance, business, government
10 years plan byCISL
The vision of the plan is to lift and tilt the playing field for business such that, over time, the economy generates positive outcomes for people within safe environmental limits
Rewiring the Economy is a catalyst for change, requiring extensive and diverse collaboration over the next decade to deliver its aims
non
Public procurement, service delivery, planning policy, education, research funding, innovation support and other levers of industrial (and infrastructure) policy can all be harnessed to enhance ‘public goods’ such as living conditions, employment, public space and environmental quality
55
Sustainability leadership model
Leadership Context
- External
- Internal
Individual Leader
- Traits
- Styles
- Skills
- Knowledge
Leadership Actions
- Internal (informed decisions, strategic direction, mgt incentives, accountability, empowerment...)
- External (partnerships, S products, S awareness, Stakeholder transparency)
simple deffinition of S Leadership
A sustainability leader is someone who inspires and supports action towards a better world
S Leaders "build a climate of support and accountability, rather than control"
na
what are top two S issues id'ed by CEOs?
Education and Climate change
triple bottom line
It's growht without stealing from the future generations.
Integrating social, E and economic performance.
beginning of industrial revolution
1750s England.. James watt
How many planets currently used for resources and absorb waste?
1.7x , project 2x in 2030
Plantetary boundaries
The planetary boundaries concept presents a set of nine planetary boundaries within which humanity can continue to develop and thrive for generations to come (to remain in holoscene era, but 3 large have evidence of alone being tipping point, other 6 contribute to or accumulate together as tipping point): Climate system, ocean acidification, stratospheric ozone layer). Transgressing these boundaries could generate abrupt and irreversible E changes (from Holocene to anthropozene state).
Climate change
Novel entities
Stratospheric Ozone depletion
Atmospheric aerosol loading
Ocean acidification
Biochemical flows
Freshwater use
Land-system change
Biosphere integrity.
anthropozene era
Earth entered into new epoch, how earth functions, based on human activity a/o rapid acceleration in human development. Probably around 1950s
-
- 1 / 78
-