FS
fluvial systems
fluvial systems
Set of flashcards Details
Flashcards | 88 |
---|---|
Language | Deutsch |
Category | Nature Studies |
Level | Primary School |
Created / Updated | 27.01.2014 / 18.01.2020 |
Weblink |
https://card2brain.ch/box/fs
|
Embed |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/fs/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
detachment vs capacity limitations:
usually bedload is transp cap. Limited
Washload is more supply limited
2 curves: supply vs ds and capacity vs ds
RUSLE
USLE + consideration of erosion/deposition in the profile
local and remote deposition
sediment in, erosion/detachment, sediment out
ai = ri ki Ii S ci pi
avg daily soil loss = erosivity, erodibility, slope length, slope steepnes, cover management, erosion controll
can handle combinations of slopes
deposition calculation in RUSLE
detachment calculation
Dp = Vf/q * Tc*g with Tc=Kt*q*s, Vf: fall velocity, q: overland flow, g: sediment load
D = r*k*S*c*Pc*(dx)/lambda*dx
when deposition in RUSLE
if g_pot < Tc: no deposition -> g = g_pot or g=g_pot+dx*D ???
if g_pot > Tc: deposition -> g = g_pot - Dp
sediment delivery ratio
SDR(t) = Y(t)/E(t)= yield/production
for t-> inf: SDR=1
for t -> 0 ????
usefull indicator for sediment storage, BUT: caution: drainaga area of E is not the same as for Y, also not the same times when both happen!!
SDR = A0.3 where A is the drainage area of the basin
approximations of planar erosion model
used, as fully distr. model is to difficult to solve (fully coupled system, feedbacks, spatial scales, validation in nature)
1D flow, quasi 2D
sequence of planes in serie/parallel, connected by channels
modelling of: infiltration on channels + hillslopes, overland flow, variable rainfall, sed. transp, splash erosion, soil moisture
kinetic wave approximation
infiltration excess runoff
runoff when rainfall intensity exceeds infliltration capacity
f(t) depends on soil properties, decreases over time
to compute f(t): richards eq, hortons, philips, green-ampt
ponding time
time between beginning of rainfall until water starts ponding at the surface
correction for ponging time: f(t) is potential inf. rate, but if i<f(t) then it needs to be corrected:
integral f(t) from 0 to ts = i*tp
sat excess mechanism
soil is saturated from below
already small rainfall intensities generate runoff
r=i if s=1
more widespread then inf exc mech
to predict where areas get satturated: topmodel/TI
TOPMODEL assumptions
sat hyd konductivity decreases exp with depth Ks(z) = K0*exp(-fz)
water table is parallel to the soil surface so that flow at point i is qi = T(zi)*tan(beta_i)
steady state conditins for recharge rate R to water table, locally aR = qi = T0 * tan(beta_i)*exp(-fzi)
saturation when zi < psi_c
equationf for topmodel
ln(a/tan(beta)) > z_avg*f + lambda - psi_c*f
zi = z_avg-1/f*(ln(a/tan(beta))-lambda)
factors that influence landslide occurence
flow in subsurface is important for overall soil stability
geological: rock characteristics, weathering, bedrock structure
soil engineering: soil shear strength
geomorphic: slope gradient, slope shape, aspect, altitude, soil depth
hydrologic: precipitation, infiltration, soil water flow processes
vegetation
seismic + volcanic effects
-> factors can be predisposing or triggering
soil shear strength as a factor for landslide occurence
is f(nomal stress, cohesion, int angle of friction)
cohesion: true cohesion + apparent cohesion
true cohesion: bonding of particles
apparant cohesion: soil moisture, grain seizes, density, roots ....
infinite slope model
shear strength of soil layer < shear stress on soil -> landslide, shear failure
assumption: H << L
if FS < 1 -> likely to fail
application: map susceptibility for landslides in space
most sensible parameters: h, H, u, (sat soil depth, total soil depth, pore water pressure)
infinite slope model
shear strength of soil layer < shear stress on soil -> landslide, shear failure
assumption: H << L
if FS < 1 -> likely to fail
application: map susceptibility for landslides in space
most sensible parameters: h, H, u, (sat soil depth, total soil depth, pore water pressure)
Factor of savety
used in infinite slope model
FS = soil strength/ shear stress = S/T = c/W*sin(beta)+tan(phi)/tan(beta)-u*tan(phi)/W*tan(beta)
how to exceed failure envelope
increase slope angle
rise pore water pressure
rise in ground water level
reduced apparent cohesion
how to account for uncertainty in the factor of safety
define a range of parameters and compute the probability P(Fs>1)
Monte Carlo analysis
SINMAP approach: wors case scenario SI > 1 if unconditionally stable (Fs_min>1)
best case scenario: SI = 0 if unconditionally unstable (Fs_max<1)
random scenario between SI = 0..1, SI = Pr(Fs>1)
contingency table = confusion martix?
for accuracy evaluation of predicted events
correct predicted safe, correct predicted unsafe
fals alarms, missed
comparison of efficiency, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood
receiver operating characteristics ROC
graph for sensitivity, specificity, error I, error II
for different thresholds
the more bent the curve is, the better (less errors)
classification of river morphology
straight
braiding
meandring
anastomosing
-> are f(channel forming q, slope)
how and why do river morphologies change?
change from straight to braiding
with increasing slope, or increasing channel forming q
channel forming q
representative q that fundamentally shapes the channel
e.g. bankfull, mean anual flood etc
how to quantify basin morphology
hortons law
basin shape
width function
hortons law
order streams -> compute morphologic variables
Rb, Rl, Ra
Drainage density: D = LT/A_Omega = 1/A_Omega * sum(N_omega*L_omega_avg)
width function
to quantify river morphology
relative distributing drainage area from the outlet.
if v=konst -> W(x) = distr of travel times in basin
at-a-station hyd geometry
for a given corss-section and changing discharge, channel geometry is fitted with the power law relations
(v=k*Qn, w=a*Qb d=c*Qf)
downstream hydr geometry
for a given river system, channel geometry is fitted for discharge of the same frequency of occurence. often bankfull or mean annual discharge...
bankfull, most effective, channel forming discharge
bankfull: flow that fills channel just to the top of the banks
most effective: flow that transports the most sediment on the long term
channel forming: flow that would form the same channel as the natural flow hydrograph does.
-> they can all be the same, but do not need to...
what are fractals?
structures that have similar patterns/ geometric characteristics over a range of scales
objects with identical propery scaled parts are identical to the original, they are scale invariant
fractal dimension
D= lim(log(N(r)/log(r)), r->0
D=0 point, D=1 line, D=2 area
in reality often 1.1...1.3
river network often have 2 dimensions: D≈1.1 -> shape of individual streams on small scale
D≈2 -> representing branching character of the network
can be expressed by hortons law: D = log(Rb)/log(Rl)
deterministic fractals
perfectly scaling (e.g. koch curve)
have a unique fractal dimension
are absolute scale free
statistical fractals
have a scaling range where this relation holds
e.g. rivers, coastlines
local optimality in energy expenditure
to describe river network structure
identifying if (mean dissipation rate)/(unit channel) = konstant, if yes-> optimal
omega = tau * v = (rho*g*Sf*Q)/Pw = konst
idea/reason for optimal energy expenditure
benefits
erosion/depositon form channel in such a way that transport capacity is equal in the system (on the longterm).
-> equilibrium which is never reached but channels are adjusting towards it.
usefull to identify streams/ sections that deviate from the "optimal state"
what is a riparian system
belonging to the bank of a river
traditional semi-terrestrial areas
influenced by freah water, extending from the edge of water towards the edges of upland communities
very dynamic, e.g. clearance by flooding -> regrowth or not if to dry/wet etc...
abiotic + biotic env, lotic, lentic, semi-lotic
exchange of water, sediment, energy, nutrients on 4 dimensions
when is a riparian system healthy?
interconnected corridors
food webs, habitats
clustering + dispersion of populations
needs of a healthy floodplain forest
needs: flood disturbance -> cleaning & newly deposited sediment -> regeneration
hydrology: variability in flow
physical env: amont, variability
biology: diversity
water quality: temp. pH, BOD
geomorphology: eg. sediment load
essential needs of a healthy floodplain forest
regular low to medium flows: maintain water table -> growth
periodic high flows: channel movement + sediment deposition -> regeneration sites
well timed high + low flows: in growing season -> delivery of seeds -> establishment
gently traped flows after peak: sucessfull seed establishment (1-2.5 cm/d)
no high flows during sexond half of growing season: no destruction of seedlings
what types of regeneration sites for a floodplain forest
open sites: no competition for pioneers
moist enough: rooting of seeds
near to water: moisture + organis debris
different sediments: niches, variation