FS
fluvial systems
fluvial systems
Kartei Details
Karten | 88 |
---|---|
Sprache | Deutsch |
Kategorie | Naturkunde |
Stufe | Grundschule |
Erstellt / Aktualisiert | 27.01.2014 / 18.01.2020 |
Weblink |
https://card2brain.ch/box/fs
|
Einbinden |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/fs/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
Lernkarteien erstellen oder kopieren
Mit einem Upgrade kannst du unlimitiert Lernkarteien erstellen oder kopieren und viele Zusatzfunktionen mehr nutzen.
Melde dich an, um alle Karten zu sehen.
local optimality in energy expenditure
to describe river network structure
identifying if (mean dissipation rate)/(unit channel) = konstant, if yes-> optimal
omega = tau * v = (rho*g*Sf*Q)/Pw = konst
idea/reason for optimal energy expenditure
benefits
erosion/depositon form channel in such a way that transport capacity is equal in the system (on the longterm).
-> equilibrium which is never reached but channels are adjusting towards it.
usefull to identify streams/ sections that deviate from the "optimal state"
what is a riparian system
belonging to the bank of a river
traditional semi-terrestrial areas
influenced by freah water, extending from the edge of water towards the edges of upland communities
very dynamic, e.g. clearance by flooding -> regrowth or not if to dry/wet etc...
abiotic + biotic env, lotic, lentic, semi-lotic
exchange of water, sediment, energy, nutrients on 4 dimensions
when is a riparian system healthy?
interconnected corridors
food webs, habitats
clustering + dispersion of populations
needs of a healthy floodplain forest
needs: flood disturbance -> cleaning & newly deposited sediment -> regeneration
hydrology: variability in flow
physical env: amont, variability
biology: diversity
water quality: temp. pH, BOD
geomorphology: eg. sediment load
essential needs of a healthy floodplain forest
regular low to medium flows: maintain water table -> growth
periodic high flows: channel movement + sediment deposition -> regeneration sites
well timed high + low flows: in growing season -> delivery of seeds -> establishment
gently traped flows after peak: sucessfull seed establishment (1-2.5 cm/d)
no high flows during sexond half of growing season: no destruction of seedlings
what types of regeneration sites for a floodplain forest
open sites: no competition for pioneers
moist enough: rooting of seeds
near to water: moisture + organis debris
different sediments: niches, variation
main components of natural flow regime
5 critical components:
magnitude of flow
frequency of occurence of flow above a given magnitude
duration of flood, low flow etc
timing/predictability of flow: important for seeds
rate of change / flashiness: change a lot due to dams (dQ/dt)
local scale management
allows management of physical processes/landforms
direct form of management
rather local effect only, does not fix the problem - just its effects
easy to controll
small consensus needed
cause + effects are obvious
usefull to threat sections only - e.g. between irreparable sections
examples of local scale management
increase roughness
setting back flood defense
re-connectin side arms
mimikry natural flow hydrograph
deposit sediment
managing vegetation + wood debris
catchment scale management
sustainable solution
does fix the whole system
not very practical
why is catchment scale management not practical
difficult to predict impact
uncontrolled management: not aceptable to managers & owners
too many stakeholders: difficult for consensus
examples of catchment scale management
managing downstream of dams: e.g. recruitment box
managing water abstraction level: controll of timing, quantity, seasonality
managing sediment flux
allow landslides
how to assess the sucess of a river restoration project
assesment requires:
measure range of ecosystem attributes
identify value of it
compare restored- unrestored forest
compare with reference forest
+ monitoring!
how to monitor a restoration project?
variables that do not vary
measure: key physical processes
biological response
simple + practical
repeated + compared
rapide response
what is a fluvial system?
biotic/abiotic -> interact on different scales in space + time
driven by water + sediment
sensitivity to disturbance is low on basin scale, high on habitat scale
structure: long, lat, verical & time
production, transfer & deposition zone
upstream/ downstream controlled
very dynamic
basin + floodplain scale = not manageable
name the 6 geomorph concepts of landscape change
uniformity
threaholds
landscape evolution
complexity
self organized criticality SOC
optimality
uniformity concept
process laws remain the same for past, present and future
narure of processes does not change, frequency distr does not change
threshold concept
system only responds when treshold is exceeded
external or internal thresholds
examples of internal thresholds
critical slope
meander cutoff
concept of landscape evolution
uplift and erosion form landscape
river is in equilibrium of transport cap and sediment supply
after disturbance: re-establishing of equilibrium
two models: progressive change, episodic change
concept of landscape evolution
uplift and erosion form landscape
river is in equilibrium of transport cap and sediment supply
after disturbance: re-establishing of equilibrium
two models: progressive change, episodic change
important factors for landscape evolution concept
rates of U(t) and e(t)
their temp variability
intermitency (periodizität)
prob dist of large events
feedbacks
complexity concept
FS is complex because:
processes act together
many timescales involved
adjustment take long and overlap
external and internal forces adjust the system
-> complexity = predictable??
Self-organized criticality SOC
system organises itself in a critical state
in the critical state, all seizes of events may occur
predictability is only in a mean statistical way possible
critical state is: an attractor, globaly stable, locally instable
stat properties of SOC are very similar to natur
problems of SOC
does not work for all granular piles
optimality concept
based on efficiency of transporting sediment
local optimality: equal energy dissipation per unit channel
global optimality: minimal energy dissipation in total
-> very similar to natur
what is landscape connectivity
what is important
fully coupled, uncoupled, de-coupled
important: effectiveness, magnitude, direction of coupling
forms of landscape connectivity
lateral: hillslope-channels
longitudinal: upstream-downstream
vertical: river-aquifer
disconnectivity: buffers, barriers, blankets
forms of disconnectivity
and boosters
buffers: swamps, floodplains
barriers: steps, slugs
blankets: floodplains
boosters: gorges
-
- 1 / 88
-