FS

fluvial systems

fluvial systems

Christian Voegeli

Christian Voegeli

Set of flashcards Details

Flashcards 88
Language Deutsch
Category Nature Studies
Level Primary School
Created / Updated 27.01.2014 / 18.01.2020
Weblink
https://card2brain.ch/box/fs
Embed
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/fs/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>

detachment vs capacity limitations:

 

usually bedload is transp cap. Limited
Washload is more supply limited

2 curves: supply vs ds and capacity vs ds

 

RUSLE

USLE + consideration of erosion/deposition in the profile

local and remote deposition

sediment in, erosion/detachment, sediment out

ai = ri ki Ii S ci pi

avg daily soil loss = erosivity, erodibility, slope length, slope steepnes, cover management, erosion controll

can handle combinations of slopes

 

deposition calculation in RUSLE

detachment calculation

Dp = Vf/q * Tc*g with Tc=Kt*q*s, Vf: fall velocity, q: overland flow, g: sediment load

D = r*k*S*c*Pc*(dx)/lambda*dx

when deposition in RUSLE

if g_pot < Tc: no deposition -> g = g_pot or g=g_pot+dx*D ???

if g_pot > Tc: deposition -> g = g_pot - Dp

sediment delivery ratio

SDR(t) = Y(t)/E(t)= yield/production

for t-> inf: SDR=1

for t -> 0 ????

usefull indicator for sediment storage, BUT: caution: drainaga area of E is not the same as for Y, also not the same times when both happen!!

SDR = A0.3  where A is the drainage area of the basin

approximations of planar erosion model

used, as fully distr. model is to difficult to solve (fully coupled system, feedbacks, spatial scales, validation in nature)

1D flow, quasi 2D

sequence of planes in serie/parallel, connected by channels

modelling of: infiltration on channels + hillslopes, overland flow, variable rainfall, sed. transp, splash erosion, soil moisture

kinetic wave approximation

infiltration excess runoff

runoff when rainfall intensity exceeds infliltration capacity

f(t) depends on soil properties, decreases over time

to compute f(t): richards eq, hortons, philips, green-ampt

 

ponding time

time between beginning of rainfall until water starts ponding at the surface

correction for ponging time: f(t) is potential inf. rate, but if i<f(t) then it needs to be corrected:

integral f(t) from 0 to ts = i*tp

sat excess mechanism

soil is saturated from below

already small rainfall intensities generate runoff

r=i if s=1

more widespread then inf exc mech

to predict where areas get satturated: topmodel/TI

TOPMODEL assumptions

sat hyd konductivity decreases exp with depth Ks(z) = K0*exp(-fz)

water table is parallel to the soil surface so that flow at point i is qi = T(zi)*tan(beta_i)

steady state conditins for recharge rate R to water table, locally aR = qi = T0 * tan(beta_i)*exp(-fzi)

saturation when zi < psi_c

equationf for topmodel

ln(a/tan(beta)) > z_avg*f + lambda - psi_c*f

zi = z_avg-1/f*(ln(a/tan(beta))-lambda)

factors that influence landslide occurence

flow in subsurface is important for overall soil stability

geological: rock characteristics, weathering, bedrock structure

soil engineering: soil shear strength

geomorphic: slope gradient, slope shape, aspect, altitude, soil depth

hydrologic: precipitation, infiltration, soil water flow processes

vegetation

seismic + volcanic effects

-> factors can be predisposing or triggering

soil shear strength as a factor for landslide occurence

is f(nomal stress, cohesion, int angle of friction)

cohesion: true cohesion + apparent cohesion

true cohesion: bonding of particles

apparant cohesion: soil moisture, grain seizes, density, roots ....

infinite slope model

shear strength of soil layer < shear stress on soil -> landslide, shear failure

assumption: H << L

if FS < 1 -> likely to fail

application: map susceptibility for landslides in space

most sensible parameters: h, H, u, (sat soil depth, total soil depth, pore water pressure)

infinite slope model

shear strength of soil layer < shear stress on soil -> landslide, shear failure

assumption: H << L

if FS < 1 -> likely to fail

application: map susceptibility for landslides in space

most sensible parameters: h, H, u, (sat soil depth, total soil depth, pore water pressure)

Factor of savety

used in infinite slope model

FS = soil strength/ shear stress = S/T = c/W*sin(beta)+tan(phi)/tan(beta)-u*tan(phi)/W*tan(beta)

how to exceed failure envelope

increase slope angle

rise pore water pressure

rise in ground water level

reduced apparent cohesion

how to account for uncertainty in the factor of safety

define a range of parameters and compute the probability P(Fs>1)

Monte Carlo analysis

SINMAP approach: wors case scenario SI > 1 if unconditionally stable (Fs_min>1)

best case scenario: SI = 0 if unconditionally unstable (Fs_max<1)

random scenario between SI = 0..1, SI = Pr(Fs>1)

 

contingency table = confusion martix?

for accuracy evaluation of predicted events

correct predicted safe, correct predicted unsafe

fals alarms, missed

comparison of efficiency, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood

 

receiver operating characteristics ROC

graph for sensitivity, specificity, error I, error II

for different thresholds

the more bent the curve is, the better (less errors)

classification of river morphology

straight

braiding

meandring

anastomosing

-> are f(channel forming q, slope)

 

how and why do river morphologies change?

change from straight to braiding

with increasing slope, or increasing channel forming q

channel forming q

representative q that fundamentally shapes the channel

e.g. bankfull, mean anual flood etc

how to quantify basin morphology

hortons law

basin shape

width function

hortons law

order streams -> compute morphologic variables

Rb, Rl, Ra

Drainage density: D = LT/A_Omega = 1/A_Omega * sum(N_omega*L_omega_avg)

 

width function

to quantify river morphology

relative distributing drainage area from the outlet.

if v=konst -> W(x) = distr of travel times in basin

at-a-station hyd  geometry

for a given corss-section and changing discharge, channel geometry is fitted with the power law relations

(v=k*Qn, w=a*Qb d=c*Qf)

downstream hydr geometry

for a given river system, channel geometry is fitted for discharge of the same frequency of occurence. often bankfull or mean annual discharge...

bankfull, most effective, channel forming discharge

bankfull: flow that fills channel just to the top of the banks

most effective: flow that transports the most sediment on the long term

channel forming: flow that would form the same channel as the natural flow hydrograph does.

-> they can all be the same, but do not need to...

what are fractals?

structures that have similar patterns/ geometric characteristics over a range of scales

objects with identical propery scaled parts are identical to the original, they are scale invariant

fractal dimension

D= lim(log(N(r)/log(r)), r->0

D=0 point, D=1 line, D=2 area

in reality often 1.1...1.3

river network often have 2 dimensions: D≈1.1 -> shape of individual streams on small scale

D≈2 -> representing branching character of the network

can be expressed by hortons law: D = log(Rb)/log(Rl)

 

deterministic fractals

perfectly scaling (e.g. koch curve)

have a unique fractal dimension

are absolute scale free

statistical fractals

have a scaling range where this relation holds

e.g. rivers, coastlines

local optimality in energy expenditure

to describe river network structure

identifying if (mean dissipation rate)/(unit channel) = konstant, if yes-> optimal

omega = tau * v = (rho*g*Sf*Q)/Pw = konst

idea/reason for optimal energy expenditure

benefits

erosion/depositon form channel in such a way that transport capacity is equal in the system (on the longterm).

-> equilibrium which is never reached but channels are adjusting towards it.

usefull to identify streams/ sections that deviate from the "optimal state"

 

what is a riparian system

belonging to the bank of a river

traditional semi-terrestrial areas

influenced by freah water, extending from the edge of water towards the edges of upland communities

very dynamic, e.g. clearance by flooding -> regrowth or not if to dry/wet etc...

abiotic + biotic env, lotic, lentic, semi-lotic

exchange of water, sediment, energy, nutrients on 4 dimensions

 

when is a riparian system healthy?

interconnected corridors

food webs, habitats

clustering + dispersion of populations

needs of a healthy floodplain forest

needs: flood disturbance -> cleaning & newly deposited sediment -> regeneration

 

hydrology: variability in flow

physical env: amont, variability

biology: diversity

water quality: temp. pH, BOD

geomorphology: eg. sediment load

essential needs of a healthy floodplain forest

regular low to medium flows: maintain water table -> growth

periodic high flows: channel movement + sediment deposition -> regeneration sites

well timed high + low flows: in growing season -> delivery of seeds -> establishment

gently traped flows after peak: sucessfull seed establishment (1-2.5 cm/d)

no high flows during sexond half of growing season: no destruction of seedlings

 

what types of regeneration sites for a floodplain forest

open sites: no competition for pioneers

moist enough: rooting of seeds

near to water: moisture + organis debris

different sediments: niches, variation