Business & Government - Between Cooperation & Conflict
Verständnisfragen etc.
Verständnisfragen etc.
Kartei Details
| Karten | 21 |
|---|---|
| Sprache | Deutsch |
| Kategorie | Politik |
| Stufe | Universität |
| Erstellt / Aktualisiert | 25.02.2016 / 07.03.2016 |
| Weblink |
https://card2brain.ch/box/business_government_between_cooperation_conflict1
|
| Einbinden |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/business_government_between_cooperation_conflict1/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
What is the Loi le Chapelier?
What is its significance?
The "Loi le Chapelier" declaired illegal any intermediary organization that represented subsections of the citizenry and thereby inerfered with its direct relationship with the state.
The reason behind: The law was passed after the French Resolution. Before the resolution, people were not recognized as individuals but as members of established social groups (estates). The revolution aimed at a direct, unmediated relationship bvetween citizens and a state conceived as a republic of individuals. Society should be lieberalised.
What is the paradox of liberalism (according to Streeck and Kenworthy)?
On the one hand, subnational collectivism of all sorts was suspected of diverting loyalty from the natinoal state and was seen as a threat to both political unity and individual liberty. But on the other hand, the preexisting economic power had not changed due to the revolution and workers only had power by acting collectively.
So, by acting against collective organization in the name of political unity, individual freedom and econeomic liberty to safeguard the proper individualism of the republic and of the marketplce the state acted in a totalitarian way which counterdicted with its liberal image: The state infringed on the very liberty it claimed to protect.
What is state corporatism?
Where does the concept come from?
What are the two reasons why it was unsustainable?
State Corporatism: is the
What is a pluralist system of organized interest representation?
What are the power implications of such a system?
xxx
What is a neo-corporatist system of interest intermediation?
Why are these groups called “intermediary organisations”?
xxx
What is the logic of influence?
What is the logic of membership?
Why is there a bigger tension between these two logics in neocorporatist countries?
What are “yellow unions”?
xxx
What does it mean to “share public space”?
Why would the state share the public space?
Why would intermediary organisations agree to share the public space?
xxxx
What is “social partnership”?
Why is it important?
xxx
Why was there a logic of “political exchange” at play in wage bargaining?
Why no more?
xxx
Why are unions and employer associations particularly strongly involved in economic policy making in corporatist countries?
xxx
How does wage bargaining relate to Keynesian macroeconomic management?
xxx
How does wage bargaining relate to Keynesian macroeconomic management?
xxx
Why did Keynesian concertation (often) fail?
Why did employers start to mobilize against it?
Why are the early 1970s generally considered a major turning point (in Western Europe)?
xxx
What is the “hump-shaped hypothesis”?
What do public sector unions have to do with this?
xxx
How does wage bargaining relate to more supply-side oriented macroeconomic management?
xxx
What is supply-side corporatism?
What are social pacts?
xxx
Why do unions participate in social pacts?
xxx
Why were there no (only few) social pacts after 2008?
xxx
What is the Electoral System Choice Theory?
Was besagt die Macht-Ressourcen-Theorie (Power-Resource Theory)?
Die Macht-Ressourcen-Theorie besagt, dass, je stärker die Arbeiterbewegung ist, desto mehr Widerstand gegenüber den Deregulierungswünschen der Arbeitgeber kann geleistet werden. Somit bleibt ein höheres Maß an sozialer Solidarität erhalten. D.h. der Grad der Gleichheit und sozialen Solidarität einer Gesellschaft hängt von der Stärke der organisierten Arbeit ab
Was besagt die Arbeitsmarkt-Dualismus Theorie (Labor-Market-Dualism Theory)?
Die Arbeitsmarkt-Dualismus Theorie besagt, dass die gegenwärtigen Markttrends die Konflikte zwischen "Insidern" (d.h. Kernarbeitern, die Arbeit haben und ihre privilegierte Position auf dem Arbeitsmarkt behalten wollen) und "Aussenseitern" des Arbeitsmarktes (d.h. Menschen, die keine Arbeit haben oder sich in prekären Beschäftigungsverhältnissen befinden und daher nicht das gleiche Lohn- und Leistungspaket wie Insider geniessen) verschärft hat.
