Intimate Relationship
Intimate Relationship
Intimate Relationship
Fichier Détails
Cartes-fiches | 25 |
---|---|
Langue | English |
Catégorie | Psychologie |
Niveau | Université |
Crée / Actualisé | 28.01.2020 / 28.01.2020 |
Lien de web |
https://card2brain.ch/box/20200128_intimate_relationship
|
Intégrer |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20200128_intimate_relationship/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
Social Control Theory
Intimate relationships increase the negative consequences of deviant behavior.
- People in intimate, committed relationships are less likely to misuse alcohol and drugs (Maume, Ousey, & Beaver, 2005).
- Intimate relationships help to regulate behavior.
Selection Effect
- Happier and healthier ppl. are more attractive to potential Relationship Partners
- IR offers protection effects
Prattfall Effect
- Ppl. are seen as more attractive if they have small flaws they feel a bit embarssed about: Other can relate to them better -> everyone think they're perfect with small flaws
- Maybe similarity is respnsible for the Plattfall Effect: Ppl. are more attracted to ppl. with the same background and values
- Similarity matters less when it comes to personality
Mere Exposure Effect
The mere-exposure effect is a psychological phenomenon by which people tend to develop a preference for things or ppl. merely because they are familiar with them. In social psychology, this effect is sometimes called the familiarity principle.
Non-Love
Neither intimacy, passion, or commitment are present. No connection. Indifference.
Infatuated love
Passion without intimacy or commitment. Sometimes referred to as “puppy love” or a crush. Romantic relationships often start out this way and turn into romantic love over time. However, this evolution doesn’t always happen and this type of love is also known to sometimes spontaneously end and disappear, leaving nothing else in its place
Empty love
Commitment without passion or intimacy. This can happen in instances when someone is desperate for a long-term commitment for other reasons (marriage, children, financial stability, etc.) but doesn’t actually connect with their partner and forces it. It also can be an evolution in a relationship over time that starts out with passion, intimacy, or both but loses those elements.
Romantic love
Passion and intimacy but no commitment. (When this kind of love is also committed, it’s another type — consummate love. See #8 below.)
Companionate love
Intimacy and commitment but with no passion. Certain close friendships (best friends, long-time friends, etc.) fall into this category. This category also includes long-term relationships where passion is no longer present, but the members still feel bonded and connected in other ways. The love someone feels for family members that they’re close to also falls into this category.
Fatuous love
Passion and commitment but no intimacy. Typically this looks like a brief passionate period of New Relationship Energy followed by a serious commitment (marriage, moving in together, etc.) before the people involved have a chance to really get to know one another and bond on a non-passionate level.
Consummate love
Love that includes all three elements: Intimacy, passion, and commitment. This is the idealized romantic love that is shown to us in books and movies. What we’re inculcated from a young age to consider
#RelationshipGoals. In his research, Sternberg found that while this state of love does occur in some relationships, it rarely is sustained permanently and is instead a state that comes and goes even in an ideal relationship, replaced with other forms of love at times when one or more pieces of the triangle temporarily disappear.
Theory of Parental Investment
Men and women differ in size of theri Parental Investment
- Women are able to have limited numbers of children
- Tend to be the primary care giver until offspring is independent
- Men can father more children in short period
Evolutionary Theory
Partner Preferences
Women: Physically, psychologically and socially strong mates with resources + intension to stay
Men: Prefer women who invest only in their children (not others)
Attachment Theory (Working Models of Attachement)
- Secure
- Preoccupied
- Fearful
- Dismission
Working Models guide strategies to regulate social relationships + interpersonal regulation of own emotions also they shape cognitions + behaviors in relationships
Social Exchange Theory
Wighin rewards and costs
- Financial and nonmaterial
Being satisfied is not being commited!
Commitment: Intention to remain in IR
Social Learning Theory
Are exchanged behaviors rewarded? -> repeate behavior
Why do ppl. engange in negative behavior?
They get attention for it.
Social Ecological Model
Broader context as stressors (work...)
Macrosystem: Nationality
Mesosystem: Culture
Migrosystem: Family
Big 5 and how they influce our IR
- Openness to experience (inventive/curious vs. consistent/cautious) (inconsistant)
- Conscientiousness (efficient/organized vs. easy-going/careless)
- Extraversion (outgoing/energetic vs. solitary/reserved)
- Agreeableness (friendly/compassionate vs. challenging/detached)
- Neuroticism (sensitive/nervous vs. secure/confident)
The Nature Explenation
Behaviours that helped ppls. genes survive
Successful behaviour for men: Large no. of sexual partners. Engaging in aggressive behaviour to help protect partners + offspring.
Successful behaviour for women: Small number of sexual partner. providing care for offstirngs, ensuring that sexual partner stay
The Nurture Explenation
Gender differences arise due to social expectations. Pressue of society rather than pressure of genes. Help explain many gender differences in behaviour.
Cross-over / Partner Effect
Partner A's high workload impact partner B
Spill-over Effect
Extradyadic Stress -> Intradyadic Stress