int. Litigation
,,.mn
,,.mn
Set of flashcards Details
Flashcards | 23 |
---|---|
Language | Deutsch |
Category | Micro-Economics |
Level | Primary School |
Created / Updated | 23.05.2019 / 24.05.2019 |
Weblink |
https://card2brain.ch/box/20190523_int_litigation
|
Embed |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20190523_int_litigation/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
Part I:
What is the basic idea of the "Forum non conveniens"?
a foreign client who escapes litigation in the United States can avoid
- Inconveniens of Litigation in the US
- Discovery dangers and expense
- possible punitive damages
Definition of "Forum non conveniens"?
It is a discretionary doctrine that allows a court to dismiss a case that might be more properly heard in another forum (such as another country)
Clerides v. Boeing Co. 534 F. 3d: a common law doctrine of forum non conveniens allows a trial court to dismiss a suit over which it would normally have jurisdiction if it best serves the conveniens of the parties and the ends of justice.
Two part test?
- Availability of a foreign forum (are all the parties amenable to process and subject to the jurisdiction of that foreign forum)
- Adequacy of the foreign forum (the parties will not be deprived of remedies or be treatend unfairly)
= If an adequate alternative forum is available, the court will weigh private and public interest factors
What are private interest factors?
- relative ease of access to sources of proof
- availability of compulsory process for attendance of unwillig witnesses
- cost of obtaining the assistance of willing witnesses
- possibilities to view the premises (if appropriate)
- other practial factors that make trial of a case easy, expenditious and inexpensive
what are the public interest factors?
- burden on courts with crowdes dockets
- local interest in having disputes decides locally
- interest in having the trial in the forum whose law will govern
- interest in avoiding unnecessary conflicts of law
- unfair burden of jury duty for citizens if there is no relationship to the forum
How to win a motion to dismiss (Antrag auf Klageabweisung) based on forum non conveniens?
to prevail on a motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens, the defendants must show that the relevant private and public interest factors strongly favor transfer of the case
How can parallel proceedings be solved?
- motion to stay (Antrag auf Sistierung des Verfahrens)
- anti-suit injunction (prevents an opposing party from commencing or continiuing proceedings in another jurisdiction or forum)
- motion to compel arbitration (Antrag Streiterledigung zu erzwingen)
Part III:
Why is US such an litigation friendly place?
- Filling fees are low, in Europe there is a filing fee which is relatively to the value of a claim
- contingency fee: Lawyer takes the procedural risks. a party does not have to pay the lawyer, until they win. if they lose, the party has nothing to pay
- Juries: untrained persons and the reason why in US are that high damages
- damages: punitive damages, economic damages and damages for pain and suffering
-- punititive damages: state wants to punish the defendant, that means that there is a criminial element in civil law. a person can be punished twice (ne bis in idem). Punitive damages should make companies to change their behaviour. Compensating is not enough
-- economic damages: medical bills, therapy cost, wage loss
-- damages for pain and suffering (Genutuung): immaterila hardship
- easy jurisdiction rules
- "american rule": loser do not have to pay, that means low risks to bring a lawsuit
- discovery procedure: both sides can gather information of the other sides case, it is easy to build a case
- class action: lawsuit that many victims can sue together a defendant
- reality in US: settle (very little cases go to litigation)
Whats the danger of bringing foreign companies, sovereignties to US court?
- no knowledge of US Law and US Law procedural system
- enforcement of the judgement, but it can be easy, if the opponent has a US Bank Account
Part II:
What are the main characteristics of US civil procedure?
- adversarial model (Verhandlungsgrundsatz) - heavy responsibility upon parties/attorneys; no help from the courts
- heavy cost (american rule)
- Settlement (only 1-2 % go to trial)
What is the "american rule"?
American rule provides that each party is responsible for paying its own attorney's fees, unless specific authority granted by statute or contract allows the assessment of those fees against the other party. The American rule contrasts with the English rule, under which the losing party pays the prevailing party's attorneys' fees.
What are the exceptions of the american rule?
- class action
- civil rights violations
- copyright and patent cases
- antitrust actions
Sources of civil procedure:
- before federal courts?
- before state courts?
- federal courts: federal rules of civil procedure (Title 28 US Code) / Federal Rules of Evidence - no common federal law on civil procedure (except Burden of Proof)
- state courts: state rules of civil procedure and evidence / state common law on civil procedure (Gewohnheitsrecht)
What is the "due process clause"?
Es bedarf eines ordentlichen Gerichtsverfahren (Rechtsweggarantie), um jemanden sein Leben, Freiheit oder Eigentum zu entziehen (US Constitution, 5th and 14th Amendment)
Elements of the due process clause?
- minimum contacts (Power of the court to adjudicate)
- proper notice to defendant (Personal delivery, Art. 4 FRP)
- Opporturnity of the defendant to be heard, including
-- right to be informed timely / right to present every available defense / in exceptional cases, the hearing take place after a judgement
Wann besteht eine Bundeszuständigkeit eines US District Courts?
case that arise under:
- US Constitution
- Laws of United States (Bundesrecht)
- treaties
- between citizens of different states, even though US federal law is not involved
What is the diversity of citizenship?
- US District Court has original jurisdiction of all civil actions if the sum or value of controversy exceeds 75'000 US-Dollar (exclusive Interest and costs) and is between citizens of different US-States, citiziens of a US-State and a foreign state.
Is it possible that a State-legal-question can be under federal subject jurisdiction?
yes, when there is complete diversity and the value of a claim has to be at least 75 000 US-Dollars
What is "personal jurisdiction"?
«…adresses the question whether a court has the power to render (erlassen) a binding, enforceable judgment defining or declaring the rights and duties of the parties
- Question of personal jurisdiction is the question of personal jurisdiction over the defendant
What are the traditional approaches of personal jurisdiction? (1/2)
- domicile and residence in the state of a court
- domicile = intent to stay + facts on physical location (place of living, General Charakter - place where de defendant always can be sued, based on the sovereignity theory)
- "consent" (defendant does not challenge jurisdiction) - Prorogation; the defendant has not claimed that the court is not competent
- IMPORTANT: Firstly, the jurisdiction has to be doubt and afterwards the claim has to be doubt
- Presence (Anwesenheit)
- After the pennoyer-Doctrine there is personal jurisdiction, if a party is served with process while physically present within the state.
What is the traditional approach of personal jurisdicition? (2/2)
What are the purpose of the Hague Evidence Convention?
- Methods to take evidence abroad in civil or commercial matters (only between state parties)
- it provides for taking evidence by means of letters of request or by diplomatic or consular agents and commissioners
- help resolve differences between civil law and common law systems with respect to taking evidence
What is a "letter of request"? What law will govern the letter of request?
- by using letter of request, a judicial authority of a state party (the requesting state) can ask the competent authority of another state party (the state addressed) to obtain evidence for use in judicial proceedings in the requesting state.
- the law of the state addressed applies to the execution of the letter of request.