approaches FMH


Thomas Rychen
Diese Karteikarten bieten eine detaillierte Anleitung für den posterioren Zugang zum Hüftgelenk, auch bekannt als Moore- oder Southern-Ansatz. Sie konzentrieren sich auf die Anatomie, einschließlich der Arterien, des Gluteus maximus und des Piriformis, sowie auf die chirurgischen Techniken wie die Dissektion und die Positionierung des Patienten. Der Inhalt eignet sich besonders für Medizinstudenten und Chirurgen, die sich auf Hüftarthroplastik, Arthroskopie oder traumatologische Eingriffe spezialisieren, da er praktische Einblicke in die Durchführung und Risiken des Verfahrens bietet.
Cartes-fiches
10
Utilisateurs
2
Langue
Allemand
Catégorie
Médecine
Niveau
Autres
Créé / Mis à jour
21.10.2012 / 23.11.2017

Cartes-fiches

Indications

THA

hemiarthroplasty

ORIF of posterior acetabular fxs

open reduction of posterior hip dislocations

dependent drainage of hip sepsis

removal of loose bodies

pedicle bone grafting

Intermuscular plane

fibers of gluteus maximus split (inferior gluteal nerve)

Position

Position

place in true lateral position

drape in order to allow full motion of hip

Incision

Incision

make 10 to 15 cm curved incision centered on posterior aspect of greater trochanter

begin 7 cm above and posterior to GT

curve over the GT and continue down shaft of femur

mini-incision approach shows no longterm benefits to hip function

Superficial dissection

Superficial dissection

incise fascia lata to uncover vastus lateralis distally

lengthen fascial incision in line with skin incision

split fibers of gluteus maximus in proximal incision (this is a vascular plane, so split muscle gently and cauterize vessels as they appear)

Deep dissection

Deep dissection

internally rotate the hip to place the short external rotators on stretch

place stay suture in piriformis and obturator internus tendon (short external rotators)

detach piriformis and obturator internus close to femoral insertion and reflect backwards to protect sciatic nerve

incise capsule with longitudinal or T-shaped incision

dislocate hip with internal rotation after capsulotomy

Dangers

Sciatic nerve

can be damaged by retractors (keep them on the muscles)

remember sciatic nerve can split into tibial and peroneal branches in the pelvis. If you visualize the nerve and it appears small, remember there may be another branch

Inferior gluteal artery

leaves pelvis beneath piriformis

if it is cut and retracts into the pelvis, then treat by flipping patient, open abdomen, and tie of internal iliac artery

First perforating branch of profunda femoris

at risk of injury with release of the gluteus maximus insertion

Femoral vessels

at risk with failure to protect anterior aspect of the acetabulum, or with placement of retractors anterior to the iliopsoas muscle

Where is the origin of the muscle located between the anterior acetabulum and iliac vessels?

The psoas muscle serves to protect the iliac vessels from retractors/instruments anterior to the acetabulum, and this muscle originates off the transverse processes of L1-L5. The referenced article by Skaggs et el found that the iliac vessels were on average 1 cm away from the iliopsoas at the level of the pelvic brim, but could be as close as 4mm in children. They also found that the neurovascular structures were on average 3.1 cm away from the iliopsoas at the level of its insertion at the lesser trochanter.

The medial femoral circumflex artery and first perforating branch of the profunda femoris artery anastamose at which of the following locations?

Medial to the gluteus maximus insertion

The medial femoral circumflex artery is the primary blood supplier to the adult femoral head. This artery anastamoses with the first perforating branch of the profunda femoris just medial to the gluteus maximus insertion. This is important, as sectioning the gluteus maximus tendon during posterior approaches can put both of these vessels (and the anastamosis) at risk.

A 57-year-old female with degenerative hip arthritis has questions regarding mini-incision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with comparison to traditional THA. Which of the following statements is true regarding the mini-incision technique?

No significant difference in hip function at 1 year

Mini-incision THA has not been shown to have any clinical benefit in terms of hip function at long term followup. Proponents of this technique claim less soft tissue damage may allow for faster recovery. Digioia et al, looked at mini-incision THA vs standard THA using navigation. Although limp, distance walked, and stair function was better at 6 months with mini-incision THA, there were no significant differences in pain, function, or motion at 1 year.

2) DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2003 Feb;18(2):123-8. PMID:12629599 (Link to Abstract)

Étudier