English Literature

Introduction to key terms of Literature

Introduction to key terms of Literature


L. D.
This set of flashcards helps university-level students deepen their understanding of English literature through critical theories like New Historicism, Marxist Criticism, Feminist Criticism, Deconstruction, and Psychoanalytic Criticism. It covers key concepts such as the juxtaposition of literary and non-literary texts, the influence of social class on literature, the role of gender in literary works, and the deconstruction of textual meanings. The platform supports backward learning from the target language to the source language, making it ideal for advanced learners and researchers aiming to analyze and interpret literary texts comprehensively.
Karten
197
Lernende
2
Sprache
Englisch
Kategorie
Englisch
Stufe
Universität
Erstellt / Aktualisiert
28.11.2017 / 10.12.2017

Cartes-fiches

Defamiliarsation

Taking something familiar out of its context and thus making it unfamiliar. The reader/audience is thereby forced to engage with the otherwise familiar in a new context.

Palimpsests

historically(medieval “palimpsest”): when an earlier text/older lower text (hypotext) on parchment is scraped off and a new text/upper text (hypertext) is written in its place; 

Genette: a text that cannot exist without an earlier text because it refers to  it directly or indirectly by adapting the story or major themes (--> Homer's Odyssey: Virgil's Aeneid, James Joyce's Ulysses)

Genette’s Palimpsests:core points
> Texts do not exist in isolation
> Instead, they are connected in diverse ways with other texts (context, co-text, intertextuality, metatextuality...)
> Hypertext + hypotext = palimpsestical relation
Conclusion:We need to be aware of the other texts “surrounding” any given text
We need to be aware of the categories by which we connect these texts, text do not exitst in isolation/text are always embedded in other textts / context
Subject of poetics: --> transtextuality(= architextuality + other transtextual relationship)/textual transcendence (=Erhabenheit) of the text(=all tat sets te text in a relationship, (obvious/concealead) with other text)
(-->is not the text to be considered in ist singularity(= critisism)
--> architextuality)
5 types of transtextual relationship: 
intertextuality,paratextuality,metatextuality,architextuality,hypertextuality

 

Hypertextuality

newer(upper text)hypertext and earlier(older,lower) hypotext

relationshipp uniting text B(hypertext) to an earlier text A (hypotext),not commentary
general notion of a text in the second degree : a text derived from anther preexistent text
But here text B is not speaking of text A at all but being unable to to exist without A, from which it originates through process of transformation, which it evokes more or less perceptibly without necessarily speaking of/citing it
hypertext is more considered properly literary work than is the metatext
different type of transformation: simple/direct transformation, complex indirect transformation( f.e imitation

Metatextuality

commentary

unites a given textt to another, of which it speaks without necessaringly citing it, without summoning it,(without naming it)

Intertextuality

how texts relate to each other: reference,
quoting(explicit), plagiarism(undeclared, borrrowing),references to tradition

relationship of copresence between two texts or among several texts, the actual presence of one text within another ( allusion ..

Paratextuality

eveything which surrounder the text ( bookcover, introduction),setting of the text (title, page, layout, etc.) --> how much to take into account? (e.g. are chapter titles part of the story?)

( secondary signals(allographic/autographic):(sub-,inter-)title, pre-/postfaces, notices, forewords,terminal/marginal/infrapaginal notes, epigraphs(engraved inscription),illustrations, blurbs(klappentext),book covers, dust jacket(Buchumschlag)

Architextuality

taxonomic(= classification, systematic) nature, silent /titular features, e.g. genre, self-declaration ("A Poem about Grief") determining the generic status of text is not the business of the text but that of the reader/critic/public

titular( Poems, Essays,The romance of the Rose) ,subtitular(A Novel, A story, Poemes appended to the title)

entire set of general or transcendent categories(types of discourse, modes of enunciation, literary genres) from which emerges each singular text

Lyric (Aristotle,first person speaking)

Poetry (modern), Poems (Jahn)

Epic (Aristotle,narrators and characters speaking)

Narrative (modern), Prose (Jahn)

Drama (Aristotle,characters do all the speaking)

Drama (modern) Plays (Jahn)

Criteria for catergorising

genre (drama,poetry,narrative),language, nation, aesthetic evaluation (high-brow, low-brow,popular, pulp fiction), social (children's,womens'sworking class literature), historical categories (classical,medieval,contemporary, ), time period(OE,ME,EME)media-related ( oral, written, audiovisual),relation to reality(realsitic, mimetic("imitating") vs. fantasty(anti-mimetic) literature), conventionality of mode of representation (traditidional vs innovative/experimental)  --> be able to recall three

Literary Genres

Genre as strategy

genre =a set of constitutive conventions and codes, altering from age to age, but shared by a kind of implicit contract between writer and reader. The writer may play with these prevailing generic conventions and decide to deliberately not follow them. Conventions generate (for ther reader )a set of expectations that enable the reader to make the work intelligible(=verständlich), to relate it to the world as defined and ordered by codes in the prevailing culture/naturalize it, by relating it(the work) to the world as defined and ordered by codes in the prevailing culture.

Tragedy

a serious play in which the protagonist dies in the end

Comedy

a humorous play with a happy ending

Comic relief

is the introduction of comic characters,
speeches, or scenes in a serious or tragic work, especially in dramas. Such elements were almost universal in Elizabethan tragedy ( Abrams)

Tragic relief

a tragic (or near-tragic) episode in a comedy. Tragic relief often has the function of allowing the spectators
to empathize with a protagonist or to give them some breathing space between particularly hilarious scenes.”(Jahn)

Critics that claim history is textual/narrated

Louis Montrose, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Hayden White

“The Textuality of History and the Historicity of Texts” 
History is a narrative construct
Literature is embedded in the culture of the society that produces it

Old English literature

c. 800 - 1066

Middle English literature

c. 1350 - 1476 (?)

Early Modern English literature

c. 1476 (?) - 1688 (?)

Empirical(historical) author and audience/reader/adressee

The actual author writing a text and the actual reader/audience,who writes, who reads/receives “in reality”

Implied author

Authorial presence in the text, created by the text, the ideological position and values implied by the text. ≠ empirical author, different levels. (cf. Implied author Chaucer in The Cantebury Tales addressing the implied audience; modesty topos)

Implied audience

the ideal reader role projected by a text 

Intended audience

the audience an author writes a text for, e.g. court nobility in Chaucer's case

Conspicuity(Sichtbarkeit): Overt vs. Covert narrator [Genette]

overt very visible : much narrator presence, mediator in the discourse( introduce themself/story to reader, comments to guide readers understanding), covert hardly visible/completly effaced: little narrator presence, voice that reports information

Involvmente: Homodiegetic(=Stanzel:Figural/First person narrattive)  vs. Heterodiegetic/autodiegetic(Stanzel: Authorial narrative) [Genette]

homodiegetic: the narrator is of the same world as the story he tells, heterodiegetic: the narrator is not from the same world the story is set in, autodiegetic: the narrator tells their own story

I-narrator [Stanzel]

(subjective,internal perspective) first person narrator, present as a character in his/her story: protagonist(experiencing I, I as protagnist)) or witness (witnessing I), perspective in the fictional world alwyas limited

The individual who acts as a narrator (narrating I) is also a character (experiencing I) on the level of actio

Authorial narrator [Stanzel]

(objective,external perspective) ,personal pronoun I, third person narrative(his position lies outside the story world, doesn't appear as a chracter in the story), not part of the story, ghost-/god-like, can know more about characters than they themselves,know everything about the story’s world and its characters, including their conscious thoughts and unconscious motives  ≠ author!
Omnipresent, omniscient (unlimited knowledge)

First person/authorial narrators tell (foreground their discussion) about the world with a certain distance

Figural narrative situation [Stanzel]t

third person's persepctive, situation (no proclaimed/visible narrator)

through the eyes of a character, no narrator in the shape of a fully developped chracter ( offer us direct insight into a third person)
show scenes in the wordl through the eyes of characters, 

Omniscient and omnipresent narrator [Stanzel]

an authorial narrator is all-knowing and always present

Reliable/unreliable narrator [Genette]

Depending on the kind of narrator, they can be trusted more or less. An unreliable narrator is one whom we cannot trust, e.g. because of temporal distance between discourse-NOW and story-NOW, etc. (temporal/cognitive distance ) 

Test reliability : 
consitstency: tells no contradiction between narrator's words/acts, vaues/judgments, selfimage/image by others, his version of events/thos of others
,coherence: tells story in which events leads to another( no significant temporal/logical gaps)
, correspondence: (no direct correspondence between reality/fiction),correspondence between fictional models of reality/ dominant view of wordl at the time writing, contextual fraes of reference define implicit/explicit norms
Unreliable: usually first person narrator
> Bragging, exaggeration
> fragmented story-telling
> Admitting to lying (to other characters)
> Contradicting oneself
> Misremembering facts, misquoting
falsify truth, not able to tell the truth due t lack of memory,influence of drugs, mental problems, trust /credibility related to social position, mental problems, mtives, strategies
reliable narrator: A narrator “whose rendering of the story and commentary on it the reader is supposed to take as an authoritative account of the fictional truth”
omnicient/heterodiegetic narrators = confidence
Homodiegetic narrators: more careful, limited perception/insights

Involvment:Extradiegetic vs. Intradiegetic narrator (metadiegetic)[Genette]

an extradiegetic narrator is the narrator present in the frame narrative, an intradiegetic narrator is on the narrative level of the embedded narrative(story-within-story/ embedded narrative within a frame narrative)telling embedded story from within the primary or frame narrative

On which narrative level is the narrator?
Frame narrative: Chaucer-the-pilgrim (extradiegetic narrator) meets other pilgrims on his way to Canterbury
(Embedded narrative):Characters(Wife of Bath:intradiegetic narrator) tell their tales and comment on them in the frame narrative

Focaliser [Genette]

describes the instance through which a story is perceived

when narrator assumes point og view of character( telling story  of knight from his perspective, what he sees only

The focus of perception= Focalisation, who perceives what in which way
spot focaliser by tracig the reference of the verbs of perception, feeling, thinking to the subject of the statment

Internal focalisation [Genette]

The narrative is focalised through the inside of the head of one or multiple characters(perspective within character): fixed focalisation (stays in the same character throughout the whole story,one focaliser only,one/same perspective), variable focalisation (focaliser changes from one character to another,different events, different focalisers,/ different scenes through different perspectrive), multiple focalisation (same event told through different perspectives,same event, different focalisers),Collective focalisation (group focaliser)

when the narrator assumes the point of view of one character and may narrate only what this character perceives., limiting the information to his perceptual/conceptual view of the world- narrator knows as much as character
(the question here: ‘who perceives?): the narrator is one of the characters; everything we get to know as readers is ‘through this channel’: her perception, conceptions, feelings and thoughts are central (internal focalisation: character-focalisation)

 

 

External focalisation [Genette]

The reader can only witness the characters' external behaviour /speech/action(no thoughts,feelings)
= eye of camera

 when the narrator has no access to the inner life of the characters and remains an external observer.

Zero-focalisation [Genette]

≙ Stanzel's omniscient narrator: monologic view; conflicting, dialogic perspective

when the narrator assumes the points of view of many different characters and narrates more than any of the characters could possibly know. S/he is an omniscient narrator.
we kno more than characters
Perspective cannot be attributed to someone in particular or has no restrictions( different points of view either are one comprehensive or monologic view /conflicting or dialogic perspectives

Characters (act and speak inside a narrative)

particular role played by a fictional figure in novel/play/film
— Protagonist / antagonist 
— round/flat
— characterisation
— Fictive
— not a real person — not the actor
— “anthropomorphic”(menschenähnlich
— “the construction of a fictional figure”
— products of discourse and representation
construction of a fictional figure 

Action

brought about by the characters' behaviour:  abilities, needs, motivations, intentions; force that drives the story forward

Perspective (structure)

values and norms of the characters (converging =  closed vs. Diverging = open perspective structure)

Étudier