Lecture


T. W.
This flashcard set helps university-level students explore American Literature and Culture in English. It focuses on vocabulary, grammar, and expressions related to historical and literary concepts, such as "conceit," "preparatory meditation," and "captivity narrative." The platform supports backward learning, allowing users to reverse the learning direction from the target language to the source language. Ideal for advanced learners, this set aids travelers, students, and exam takers in deepening their understanding of American literary traditions and cultural contexts.
Karten
63
Lernende
8
Sprache
Englisch
Kategorie
Englisch
Stufe
Universität
Erstellt / Aktualisiert
02.11.2017 / 26.03.2024

Lernkarten

What was the conversion narrative?

  • narrative template found even in later literary expressions
  • typical structure: unaware sinner becomes a self-aware sinner + gives himself over to God’s grace
  • talking about your conversion experience = ritual needed to become a member of the congregation: answering questions about religious experiences and convictions, justification for participation

Who wrote The New English Canaan (1637) and why? 

Thomas Morton (c. 1579–1647) 

  • Well-connected lawyer in England, forced to leave to America to avoid the law
  • First stay in 1622 – return in c. 1625 to settle near Plymouth for purely economic reasons
  • Starts trading guns and liquor to local Indian tribes for fur, inviting lots of newcomers
  • 1627: Maypole of Merry Mount => Plymouth Puritans arrest Morton, send him back to England 1628 (Merry Mount as a free community living in harmony with the natives and attracting many people from Plymouth colony; Puritans horrified by their 'beastly practices', afraid of consorting with the Indians and of physical contamination resulting from the contact with NAs => viewed Morton as adangerous man)
  • 1629 Return to Massachusetts, 1630 new arrest for arming the Indians, house is burned down
  • After flight to England publishes New England Canaan: suppressed b/c of conflict with the Puritan ideology, not rediscovered until the 1960s => presents a different view on the interaction between the NAs and the English settlers
  • Winter of 1644-45: imprisoned; died not long thereafter 

Reasons:

  • satirizing and attacking the Puritan project in the New World, targeting specific Puritan traits: Puritans as uncivilized, ignorant, dumb, unsophisticated
  • clashes with Puritans, disdained them
  • critical look at the Puritans' hypocrisy and ideology
  • criticism of Puritanism as a colonial phenomenon and of the violence and brutishness of the settlers: contrast btwn. the 'infidels''' kindness and humanity and the Puritans' inhumanity
  • presented a different image of the Native Americans and the colonial project
  • promote the settlement of New England, attract English readers (NE as a 'paradise on earth')

How does The New English Canaan satirize / ridicule the Plymouth Puritans? 

  • Hybrid text: History, political pamphlet, satire, promotional tract, different styles ==> Puritans as obstacle to colonial project, criticism of Purtitanism as a colonial phenomenon: impediment of prosperity, 'religious fanatics'
  • targets specific Puritan traits:
  • described two sorts of people: the Christians and the infidels, in favour of the infidels (more friendly, full of humanity)
  • Revealing the ambivalence and inner contradictions of Puritan self-understanding
  • Literary allusion and ambiguity against rigid literal interpretation:  presented the Puritans as lacking an understanding of the deeper meaning of literature, too literal understanding of texts; using metaphorical lang. and Biblical allusions to present NE as a paradise on earth, complex allegory and different styles (e.g. story about the erection of the maypole) not just prose but also two short poems
  • Sensuality and physical experience against moral stricture and self-discipline: search for common values of NAs and the English (joy, rituals, humanity as a contrast to the Puritans' inhumanity)
  • Classical education against religious indoctrination 
  • book divided into 3 parts:
  1. depiction of the indigenous people, emphasis on their practical nature and love towards the English, their austerity and generosity, common values (native culture and values as similar to those of the English)
  2. description of the natural wealth of NE and the abundance of fish, game and other commodities to attract English settlers
  3. departure from the previous expository sections: of the Puritans, Puritans as joyless and ridiculous

Who was Metacomet? 

  • ‘King Philipp’
  • Sachem (Chief) of the Wampanoag Indians (ca. 1639-1676) 
  • chief during the so-called King Philipp's War 1675-76 = bloodiest and most destructive conflict in Am. history, killing 5% of the English settlers and about 40% of the native tribal population

What were the reasons for the outbreak of the war between the natives and English settlers in 1675 (King Philipp's War)? 

Increasing tensions between NAs and English settlers caused by...

  • Expansion of settlements, excessive acquisition of land by white settlers
  • Legal pressure on trade between native and settlers (NAs affected by the restrictions on trade b/c they depended on trade with the settlers, their livelihood was in danger)
  • Growing tensions and distrust
  • Competition and conflict between different tribes and the various settlements and communities (in/ outside Plymouth colony; praying Indians, frontier settlements)
  • Violence and increasing hostilities 
  • execution of three tribe members by English settlers for killing an Englishman => violated the NAs' right to deal with the affair on their own => lead to the attack of Lancaster in June 1675

-->1675-76 “King Philip’s War”: Bloodiest and most destructive conflict in American history, killing 5% of the English settlers and roughly 40% of the native tribal population 

Who was Mary Rowlandson and what did she do? 

  • victim of the attack of Lancaster (later described the carnage of the attack in her captivity narrative)
  • Begin of Indian attacks: June 1675 (reaction to execution of 3 tribe members, severe living conditions and English expansion)
  • Rowlandson taken captive on February 20, 1676 
  • By (re)moving the captives from one settlement to the next, the Indians try to escape the English pursuit (see also the narrative structure of removes in Rowlandson’s text), even talked to Metacomet to discuss her return with him
  • Setting her own ransom prize (20 pounds) Rowlandson is released on May 2, 1676; two months later her remaining children are free as well (her youngest child died during her captivity)
  • After her return to Lancaster: wrote a record of her captivity; supported by influential Puritans, it is finally published (several editions) --> Narrative of punishment, hope and redemption, captivity narrative became a popular literary genre enjoying immense commercial success (glimpse of the violence that the victims of the Indians suffered, confrontation between white colonists (portrayed as superior, civilized) and the natives
  • her captivity narrative = canonical text in Am. lit., wrote about her experiences during captivity, suffering => representation of an individual experience in captivity, narrative divided into 20 different 'removes'
  • instance of Puritan literary conventions: willingness to communicate her 'conversion narrative', personal narrative of belief, emphasis on the private nature and authenticity of the text to demonstrate humility (publication not in order to put herself on the same level with male authors, but for the public benefit), idea of providential affliction, emphasis on God's sovereignty and goodness, references to the covenant of grace
  • appeared in different forms (e.g. book-length narratives, poems, letters, appendixes to sermons, etc.) 

Why was the Captivity Narrative a story of punishment, faith and redemption? 

first one by Rowlandson: one of the most popular and well-known texts well into the 18th and 19th century

  • record of an individual's experiences while under captivity: display of the NAs' violence towards the victims; experience as a testimony of God's grace
  • Captivity and Removal as test of belief (penitential pilgrimage, can be read like a conversion narrative)
  • Spiritual dimension of real experience (cf. typology)
  • Narrative of punishment, hope and redemption: captivity and affliction as God's punishment, hope of being saved through faith, the indivudial has the chance to regain her faith by being rendered completely helpless by God (dependence on God, therefore reading real events as a proof of God'sgrace), return to safety as salvation/redemption and reward for regaining faith, return to righteousness and belief, evidence of being chosen and a sign that God is on her side, unshakeable trust
  • Typological interpretation of suffering: i.e. Bible as a framework for interpreting her experiences, religious interpretation of real events, frequent references to/citations from the Bible (source of consolation and a means to make sense of the experiences and the conflict between the natives and the Puritans)
  • Religious education and affective identification through the sympathetic connection with Rowlandson
  • didactic function (instructing readers); confirming Puritan beliefs (esp. the belief of God's providence); repeated, created, and reaffirmed in Puritan texts
  • redemption = governing metaphor in captivity narratives; trust and belief in God, His providential scheme (belief that He has foreseen the events before human history)
  • later transformed into a general story of cultural conflict, the fear of cultural otherness, and a nation under attack which has to defend itself

How and why did the Pequot War break out (1637-38)? What was its consequence?

  • 1st brutal war between settlers and NAs
  • at first: Native tribes sprinkled all ober the place, no danger to settlements
  • nevertheless fear that the natives would form alliances against the English
  • expansion of the colonists lead to resistance from the Pequots => resulted in war (erupted at the native settlement of Mystic)
  • war as a stunning experience, organized effort to kill the native tribes, Pequots almost entirely extinguished, violence and brutality
  • English used the internal fractions in the tribal system to their advantage, used another tribe to fight the Pequots
  • goal = to wipe out all forms of resistance and to clear the land of the natives
  • image of the natives in English publications changed considerably, changed mutual self-descriptions + perceptions of the English and the NAs towards each other: NAs = savage, uncivilized; English = cunning, merciless
  • writings negotiating the idea of danger and the colonists' ability to defend themselves

How did English texts of that time interpret the Pequot war and portrayed the Indians afterwards?

  • the religious and the political converge
  • mixture of providence and accident: 'sweet victory', idea that God was so gracious as to give them the victory; gave them the opportunity that made victory possible
  • description of the enemy as insulting and proud => denigration of the NAs to justify the cruelty towards them and their extinguishment
  • used spiritual descriptions and allusions

 What was the status of poetry in the 17th Century in England?

• Dominant medium / form of English Renaissance court literature (Sidney, Spencer, Shakespeare ⇒ relation to plays: poetry and drama as the founding forms of English literature) => established tradition: poetry as a an accepted and representative literary expression that England identified with; both an important element of the court and of public culture, form of communication, manipulation and exchange
• greatly influenced by earlier writers ⇒ Homer, Vergil, Dante, Petrarch, the Sonnet    
• polished performance of linguistic competence and wit    
⇒formalized rhetoric
• But: poetry was also used within religious debates and as a form of spiritual (self-)reflection (e.g. John Donne, John Milton, George Herbert, John Bunyan), criticizing other poetical traditions    
• For the Puritans, poetry was a very powerful, but also rather suspicious form of expression and communication (potentially manipulative, dangerous because of its emotive aspect), therefore: ambivalent reaction to poetry: bad if it is produced to publicly perform one's ling. competences (self-empowerment and self-reverence), but good if it encouraged thought and (self-)reflection (which is central to Puritan culture)

 Why was poetry a problematic genre / medium for the Puritans?

  • knew that poetry was a very powerful, but also rather suspicious form of expression and communication (potentially manipulative, dangerous because of its emotive aspect)
  • therefore: ambivalent reaction to poetry: bad if it is produced to publicly perform one's ling. competences (which would be self-empowerment and self-reverence), but good if it encouraged thought and (self-)reflection
  • fear/rejection of imagery ⇒ iconoclastic orientation of Puritan thought and belief (images are like idols, affective and manipulative potential)
  • distrust of figurative language (ornament), rejection of mere rhetorical flourish, fear of manipulation and emotive affection, instead: plain style (rejected the rhetorical nature of poetry, not poetry per se)       
  • conflicting models of metaphorical/figurative speech: affective engagement vs.effective cognition (transformation of the emotive aspect: poetry is only substantial if affective engagement comes with effective cognition (i.e. (self-)reflection and critical thought about religious matters) --> central to Puritan culture; not pure emotions, but emotions combined with reflection, emphasis on the potential usefulness and objectives of poetry
  • Richard Baxter The Saint’s Everlasting Rest (1650): “most […] descriptions of our Glory are expressed as if they were the very flesh and sense, which though they are all improper and figurative, yet doubtless if such expressions had not been best, and to us necessary, the Holy Ghost would both have so frequently used them.”  => rejection of the rhetorical nature of poetry (dangerous)
  • Poetry as meditation on/mediation of the relation between the spiritual and the sensuous dimensions of human experience

Who was Anne Bradstreet (1612-1672) and what did she do?

  • 'mother' of Americam literature => beginning of a genuine American literature, production of the emerging American culture and literary tradition
  • 1630 arrives with Winthrop on the Arbella  => an English woman sold as an American author
  • her poetry as the ideal of poetry: correlates the spiritual and emotive affections, self-reflexive (reflecting on oneself and one's emotional responses to the world)
  • Classical education and deep interest in literature / poetry
  • 1650 The Tenth Muse, lately sprung up in America. (epic poem)
  • 1664-65 Contemplations: celebration of nature as God’s creation, divine text (one of the earliest forms of nature poetry)
  • Appropriation and reinterpretation of classical forms and models in English and Renaissance poetry (e.g. Guillaume du Bartas [French Calvinist poet], Edmund Spenser, Philip Sidney)
  • Rhetorical apology, self-assertion and irony    
  • Contemplations (1664-65) the celebration of nature as God's creation    
  • Meditation and desire - both secular and religious: reflecting on her emotional desires and responses to the world in a Puritan fashion
  • Expression of female experience    
  • Plain style and everyday experience ('domestic poems'): e.g. ‘In Memory of my Dear Grandchild’; ‘A Letter to Her Husband Absent on Public Employment’

 Who influenced Anne Bradstreet?   

Appropriation and reinterpretation of classical forms and models in English and Renaissance poetry (e.g. Guillaume du Bartas [French Calvinist poet], Edmund Spenser, Philip Sidney), frequent references and allusions to classical antique authors  

=> attempt to place herself in the established tradition of poetry (self-positioning), but writing in a colonial setting as a woman

How was the first edition of Bradstreet’s poems published and why?   

  • 1650 The Tenth Muse, lately sprung up in America: Anonymous publication by "a gentlewoman"     
  • she never intended to publish it (imagined audience of experts), published anonymously in London by her brother-in-law
  • objective: her poetry as an example and proof of the colonies' ability and potential to produce sth. of literary and cultural worth ('high literature') -->political argument), idea that America could produce sth. that was just as cultured, delightful, educative and valuable as the poetry of England:
  • Arguably the first genuinely literary production of Puritan America published in Europe (America = not yet a culture, "lately sprung up")
  • 'Wit', 'Learning' and 'Delight' as proof of literary talent and accomplishment --> encompasses the the basic function of poetry: delight and educate / learning and entertainment combined
  • establishing a form of self-understanding that is indifferent to the relation and difference to England, cultural production from America, Bradstreet (and Rowlandson) as contributions to an emerging American literature that is distinct from England

What are Bradstreet’s attitudes towards traditional poetry and prevalent ideas about female authorship?

  • highly self-reflexive, self-conscious, tradition-conscious, criticism-conscious form of poetry!, treats criticism in a strong and self-critical way while making a point for female poetry

E.g. the Prologue to The Tenth Muse):    

  • apologetic gestures: form of self-effacement; describing traditional 'typical' poetry as sth. above her abilities, establishes a hierarchy of accepted literature, not trying to minimize the worth of previous (male) poetry
  • enhancing ambivalence and ambiguity: implied criticism: e.g. criticism aimed at the unfair 'Muses' who have given Bartas all the skills but left nothing for her, ambivalent praise of Bartas' poetry ("sugar'd lines" without substance) => enters a (critical) dialogue with male poetry and with critics of female poetry
  • Irony: conflict of what is being said content-wise (her alleged inability as a poet) and what is being done (her outstanding performance in poetry), the way in which she presents her arguments as the only counter-argument against the critics of women writers
  • gender difference: presents herself as a violation of all all the other women and housewives (basically being an obstacle to herself) while at the same time proving that she is capable of good poetic performance, criticism of the people who attribute good women's poetry to theft or to mere chance   
  • negotiating a place for female writing / poetry:  attempt to self-position herself in the tradition of poetry, writing in a colonial setting as a woman, finding a place as a female writer in an American colonial context

=> writing whilst being aware of writing (self-reflexion), from self-effacing irony to straight-out criticism of the (wrong) male attitude toward female poetry to self-assertion ("I don't care what you think and do it anyway")

What is the difference between Bradstreet’s public and her domestic poetry (e.g. the mourning poems or the poems to her husband)?   

Two expressions of her  poetry:

  • stylized (epic) poetry: imagined audience = audience of experts (well-educated readers who would understand her references to classical writers and who would perhaps also be able to write poetry), poetry enters different dialogues (with male poetry and critics of female poetry); highly self-reflexive, self-conscious, tradition-conscious and criticism-conscious form of poetry => not asking for praise, but for acknowledgement and acceptance of female poetry; 'Wit', 'Learning', and 'Delight' as proof of literary talent and accomplishment
  • domestic poetry: deliberate departure from her stylized forms, plain style, poems about everyday experiences (e.g. children, household, life as a housewife etc.), family as her imagined audience, autobiographic poems, strong sense of authenticity => attempt to come up with a poetic expression for a certain feeling and experience relating to everyday life (e.g. To My Dear and Loving Husband)

How and why did the role of the captivity narrative as a literary genre change over time?

  • original framing: Puritanism and Calvinist ideology, story of faith, punishment, and redemption (emphasis on God's sovereignty and providence, cf. original title page); read as a conversion narrative and form of spiritual autobiography --> didactic function (instructing readers); confirming Puritan beliefs (providence!), religious education and affective identification (through the sympathetic connection with Rowlandson and frequent Biblical references); genre rife with contradictions: relate the first-person experience of the captive, but mediated by a Puritan minister (edited for didactic purposes)
  • but also: high degree of collective and self-identification: originally a Puritan argument about a successful settlement (besieged settlement as a test of righteousness), Puritans as the chosen people
  • later: many captivity narratives reinforce ethnocentric images of natives as primitives; at the same time, portrayal of sophisticated/ effective native practices (e.g. in warfare) --> narrative negotiates the experience of the conflict of cultures, central image = confrontation between white colonists (portrayed as superior, civilized) and the natives
  • fear + uncertainty of the captive’s position, representation of unfamiliar lands; wilderness topos: projects an image of a frontier society in the face of external dangers, a culture under attack
  • later editions: same story transformed for a larger, less religious and more secular and diverse audience (not just Puritans), different frame: not religious framework anymore because God is not as important to the people anymore, now generally read as a narrative negotiating the fear of cultural otherness (not always NAs)
  • story of martyrdom, adventure story: new literary genre, immense commercial success --> central for the American self-understanding as a frontier society

Define and describe the meditation poem - what was it’s purpose in Puritan writing, how was it suppose to work? 

E.g. the poetry of Edward Taylor (c. 1644-1729) , used by him in order to prepare himself for writing his sermons (continuity of thought and ideas):

  • Meditation poems = poems about scriptural passages from the Bible dealing with central ideas of religious faith
  • part of a Christian tradition of writing poetry (not a Puritan invention):
  • --> Poetry as a medium of self-inspection and religious self-assertion: reflection on Biblical passages and central religious ideas; immediate, personal and subjective form of writing
  • --> Religious meditation and aesthetic concentration / condensation: way of using poetic language to reflect on a certain religious / spiritual idea
  • --> Influence of Metaphysical poets: John Donne (1571-1631) and George Herbert (1593-1633): using their traditions for a specific purpose
  • --> Extended imagery and conceit: as a specific strategy to articulate abstract ideas
  • --> Poetry as a way of thinking and spiritual meditation: trying to find an expression for abstract thoughts
  • The Puritan Meditation Tradition:
  • Based on Ignatius Loyola's Spiritual Exercises (1522-24): Training belief by meditation on religious texts and images, form of mental exercise
  • Thomas Hooker The Soul's Preparation for Christ (1632): "It is a sekled exercise for two ends: first to make a further inquiry of the truth: and secondly, to make the heart affected therewith."
  • Richard Baxter The Saint's Everlasting Rest (1650): "get the liveliest Picture [of heavenly truths] in thy minds [and compare] the unseen delights of Heaven with those smaller which you have seen, and felt in the flesh" => examples of Meditation poets who have influenced Taylor

 

What is a ‘preparatory meditation’? 

  • cf. Edward Taylor's Preparatory Meditations before my Approach of the Lord's Supper
  • Taylor = by his contemporaries known as a minister (not as a poet)
  • objective: making his mind ready for writing a sermon for the Sunday service (preparing himself to write a sermon)
  • regarding poetry and sermons as two different forms of the same way of thinking: contemplation of religious ideas => continuity of thought and ideas that connected these two types of texts

What is a ‘conceit’? Can you give an example from Puritan poetry? 

  • an intellectual / logical argument held together by an inventive comparison or a central organizing trope, such as an extended metaphor or an ingenious leitmotif
  • usually an extended metaphor stretching over the entire text, specific way of using imagery to extend a certain idea or argument in poetry
  • the conceit as a means to formulate an abstract logical argument
  • characteristic of metaphysical poetry

Examples:

  • the poetry of Edward Taylor (Huswifery): the image of the spinning wheel implies the transformation of a natural resource into an artistic end product, a lasting object --> combines the realm of everyday life with the religious practice of faith --> expresses the idea of transcending the realm of everyday-life and becoming the experience of faith, union between the thinker and the object being thought about
  • John Donne's and George Herbert's metaphysical poetry

 Why was the Spanish conquest of the New World called "conquista" and what is the "reconquista"?

  • reconquista: ‚reconquest‘, recapturing Spain from the Muslims who had occupied most of the Iberian Peninsula in the early 8th century;  completed with the conquest of Granada in 1492 => Spain as a unified Christian empire
  • crusading spirit of the Reconquista preserved in the subsequent Spanish emphasis on religious uniformity
  • conquista: conquest of the New World, self-appointed mission to disseminate the Christian faith in the name of the Spanish, taking the territory from the ‚heathen‘ (the natives) to establish a Christian empire

Why did Columbus write a book "about everything he saw and experienced"?

  • meticulous documentation of time, distances, naming, actions upon arrival, formal rituals and symbols etc. as a way of re-enacting the taking possession of the new land in order to guarantee a legitimate appropriation (conversion of legal discourse)
  • his account of his sensual perceptions and the environment of the new world is indicative of his amazement in the face of the wonders and marvels of the NW, focus on the land's fertility and beauty --> depiction of a land of abundance and richness, like reentering paradise
  • descrpitions of the natives as part of his perceptions: focus on their supposed inferiority and using a dichotomy of 'us' and 'them' in order to legitimise asymmetrical power relations and to highlight the importance of spreading the Christian faith in the new world (their lack of the 'right' religion); strategically placing the NAs in a struggle between opposing forces implies a supposed need for protection --> serves to legitimise the taking of their land (morally)

Why did the English speak of 'plantations' when they were talking about the prospects of colonies in America?

  • relates to the English settlement method and their understanding of taking possession: cultivation of the new land as appropriation
  • notion of the plantation connects the idea of colonisation to agriculture (familiar experience for the English)--> planting as a metaphor for settlement and survival; the idea of growing signifies the expansion of the colonies
  • goal: form settlements that would stand, survive and grow/expand
  • references to familiar experiences and knowledge about farming used to talk about the project of colonisation
  • serves as a way of justifying the colonisation: settlement = justified if it is profitable

 

Lernen