IFM- Lecture 8

IFM lecture part 8 - Capital Structure

IFM lecture part 8 - Capital Structure


Kartei Details

Karten 18
Sprache English
Kategorie Finanzen
Stufe Universität
Erstellt / Aktualisiert 06.01.2022 / 21.01.2022
Weblink
https://card2brain.ch/box/20220106_ifm_lecture_8
Einbinden
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20220106_ifm_lecture_8/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>

What is the Capital Strucutre of a Firm?

the ratio between debt and equity
 

the picture shows two different capital strucutres

(remember: value of firm = value of bonds (debt) + value of shares (equity) = size of the pie)

debt to equity ratio < 100%

Why should shareholders in a firm care about maximizing the value of the entire firm and not only about increasing the value of their shares?

Changes in capital strucutre benefit the shareholders IF AND ONLY IF the value of the firm increases

What kind of capital strucutre should a financial manager choose?

they should choose the capital strucutre with the highest firm value because this capital structure will be most beneficial to the firm's shareholders

(remember: Goal of financial management: increase value of shares)

Define Leverage

  • Leverage refers to the use of debt (borrowed funds) to amplify returns from an investment or project.

  • leverage can magnify gains but also losses to shareholders (increased risk)

  • Investors use leverage to multiply their buying power in the market.

  • Companies use leverage to finance their assets—instead of issuing stock to raise capital, companies can use debt to invest in business operations in an attempt to increase shareholder value.

  • When one refers to a company, property, or investment as "highly leveraged," it means that item has more debt than equity.

Explain the Modigliani and Miller Proposition I (without taxes)

the value of the levered firm is the same as the value of the unlevered firm

basically: the value of the firm is always the same under different capital strucutres
 

This is the case because investors can use homemade leverage to change the capital structure and there are no taxes

What is homemade leverage and under which assumptions does it work?

homemade leverage

  • personal borrowing or lending in order to increase/ decrease leverage
  • used to recreate the effects of corporate leverage
  • ex.: buying shares in an unlevered firm with a personal loan -> increase leverage
  • assumptions:
    1. coorportions and individuals can borrow and lend at the same interest rate
    2. no taxes

Explain the Modigliani and Miller Proposition II (without taxes)

The required return on equity is a linear function of the firm's debt to equity ratio.

-> risk to equity holders rises with leverage
(remember: increasing risk means increasing potential return)
-> required return to equity holders rises with leverage

implication of MM I:
a firm's weighted average cost of capital is (r_wacc) is indipendent on the capital structure of the firm

r_S: expected return on equity
r_B: cost of debt
r_0: cost of capital of an all-equity (unlevered) firm
B: market value of debt
S: market value of equity
 

What re the implications of MM I (without taxes)

1. share price of a firm is indipendant of its capital structure
2. weighted average cost of capital of a firm is indipendant of its capital structure

How do taxes influence the MM propositions in general?

presence of coorporate taxes -> tax advantage of levered firm (less taxes to pay) -> firm's value is positivley related to its debt

because of a quirk in corporate tax law, the proportion of the pie allocated to taxes is less for the levered firm than it is for the unlevered firm

Explain the tax shield of debt

 

  • interest rate is tax deductable -> debt reduces the corporate tax by tC * rB * B (annual amount) with
    tC: corporate tax rate
    rB: interest rate on amount borrowed
    R: amount borrowed (debt)
  • debt protects some of the firm's cash flows from taxes
  • present value of tax shield (assuming perpetual cash flows): PVtaxshield = tC*R

What is the EBIT of a firm?

EBIT = earning before interest and taxes

EBIT is a company's net income before income tax expense and interest expenses are deducted. 

EBIT = Revenue - Expenses (without tax and interest)

Explain the Modigliani and Miller Proposition I (with taxes)

Leverage increases the value of a firm by the tax shield.
-> Value of levered firm = Value of an all-equity firm + PV of the tax shield

 

  • corporate leverage reduces tax payment
  • tax shield increases with rising debt -> raising cash flow b substituting debt for equity

Explain the Modigliani and Miller Proposition II (with taxes)

The cost of equity rises with leverage because the risk to equity rises with leverage. The required return on equity is a linear function of the firm's debt to equity ratio. Extended by tC denoting the corporate tax rate.

-> this means that the MM II without taxes still holds true but is extended by the effect of the tax shield

Explain the effect of coorporate taxes on the weighted average cost of capital rwacc

  • interest payments on debt are tax deductable
  • dividends are not deductable at te coorporate level

 

  • the wacc is extended by the coorporate tax factor (1-tc)
  • rwacc declines with leverage

What is the effect of personal taxes on the capital strucutre of a firm?

equity (dividend to shareholder): is being taxed twice -> coporate level tc & personal level ts

debt (interest payment to bondholders): is being taxed once -> personal level tB

if ts = tB -> bondholders receive more than shareholders -> firm should issue debt

If ts < tB -> tax advantage of debt at coorporate level is partially offeset

Which costs lead to the trade-off model concerning capital strucutre and what are their effect?

1. financial distress

financial distress = not being able to meet payments and obligations -> debt causes distress
ultimate distress = bankruptcy
financial distress costs = costs you have in order to avoid bankruptc (ex: consultants, lawyers)

-> bankruptcy costs rise faster than the tax shield with increased leverage-> distress costs tend to offset the advantages to debt -> tradeoff between tax benfit and costs of financial distress

2. Agency costs

costs due to the conflict of interest between shareholders and bondholders

in times of financial distress shareholders and bondholders tend to choose selfish strategies to help themselves

-> these strategies are costly because they lower the firm's value and therefore hurt the shareholders

=> change in the value of the firm = tax shield on debt - agency costs - costs of financial distress

 

Explain the Pecking-Order Theory and its rules.

 

  • it considers timing of capital strucutre decisions
  • underlying assumption: the manager of a firm estimates the true value of their firm better than a typical investor does.
  • the pecking order theory includes the resulting signals to the public implied in a firm's investment decisions

Rules / The Pecking Order

1. Use Internal Financing First
both equity and debt fiancing signals overvaluation of the firm
-> financing projects through retained earnings (earnings not paied out to investors) solves this problem

2. Issue Safe Securities (debt) befor Unsafer Securities (equity)
-> for investors coorporate debt is less risk than coorporate equity because investors receive fixed returns
-> issue equity only when the firm's debt capacity is reached

=> Pecking Order: 1. Internal fiancing (signal: strong firm) -> 2. debt financing (signal: firm is confident to be able to meet finacial obligations) -> 3. equity financing (signal: share prices are overvalued)

Explain the Market Timing theory

  • refuses both trade-off model and pecking order theory
  • the capital structure level a firm is driven by differences in market and book values

=> managers take advantage of market conditions when deciding on how to raise capital