Microeconomics I

Fiches de réveisions

Fiches de réveisions


Set of flashcards Details

Flashcards 336
Language English
Category Macro-Economics
Level University
Created / Updated 28.05.2019 / 02.03.2025
Weblink
https://card2brain.ch/box/20190528_microeconomics_i
Embed
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20190528_microeconomics_i/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Quantity discounts
Suppose p is constant at $1 but that p = $2 for 0 < x < 20 and
p = $1 for x > 20.

Algebra for the slope

Quantity discount graph

Quantity penalty graph

Negative price, rationing and food stamp program

More general choice sets, choice set

Intercept of all constraints

We introduce the following preference relations:

I strict preference of X over Y : X Y
I indifference between X and Y : X Y
I weak preference of X over Y : X Y

“structure” on preferences

I complete: any two bundles can be compared
I reflexive: any bundle is at least as good as itself X X
I transitive: if X Y and Y Z then X Z
Often also ‘well-behaved’ (monotonic, convex)

Indifference curves cannot cross

Assume X and Y are on different
indifference curves and for
example X > Y .
X and Z are on the same
indifference curve so X = Z.
Y and Z are on the same
indifference curve so Y = Z.
By transitivity, X = Y which
contradicts X > Y .

Perfect Substitutes

The consumer is willing to substitute one good for another at a constant rate (measured by the slope of the indifference
curves)
Only the total amount of the two commodities in bundles determines their preference rank-order

Perfect Complements

Goods that are always consumed together in fixed proportions (measured by the slope of the ray through the origin)
Only the number of pairs of units of the two commodities determines the preference rank-order of bundles

Bad, neutral, satiation point, discrete

Well behaved preferences

Monotonicity: more is preferred to less

Convexity: the average is preferred to extremes

The Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS)

Example for MRS

Preferences axioms

I complete: any two bundles can be compared
I reflexive: any bundle is at least as good as itself X >= X
I transitive: if X  >= Y and Y >= Z then X >= Z

Which of the following utility functions could be used to represent David’s preference ordering?

Not the 3rd nor the 5th

Perfect substitutes: utility function in general

mu(x1, x2) = ax1 + bx2

Perfect substitutes: when a>0 and b>0

both goods

Perfect substitutes: when a = 0

perfect substitutes: when b<0

b is a bad

Perfect complements: utility function

u (x1,x2) = min {x1, x2}    x2 = x1

2 teaspoon per cup of coffe

x1 = (1/2)x2   min {x1, (1/2)x2}

Perfect complements: determine how much x2 per x1

u (x1,x2) = min {ax1. bx2}   x2=(a/b)x1

Quasi-linear preferences

MRS independant from q of x2

Formula for the quasi-linear preferences

ũ = v (x1) + x2 

x2 = k - v(x1)

Sketch of the Cobb-Douglas function

Definition of MU

Definition of the MRS

MRS for perfect substitute: calculation

+ MRS for Cobb-Douglas

Consumers' choice: tangency condition, condition for optimization

Tangency exceptions

Kinky tastes, corner solutions, multiple tangency

 

Optimization according the utility function and the budget constraint

Optimization solution 1

Write the lagrangian with logs

First order contition

Solve for lambda

Put into FOC 1 and FOC 2

Optimization solution 2

Put MRS = -p1/p2

Inject the budget constraint

Optimization solution 3

Express x2 according to x1 with the budget constraint

Inject into the utility function

Derive the utility function to find de FOC

Consumer demand: perfect substitutes

Assuming a one-to-one substitution

Solve for p1<p2, p1=p2 and p1>p2

Build a general case: (a/b)>(p1/p2) then x1* = m / p1 and x2* = 0

Exercice slide 18 lecture 5