OT

OT 2019

OT 2019


Kartei Details

Karten 182
Sprache Deutsch
Kategorie Quizzie
Stufe Universität
Erstellt / Aktualisiert 15.04.2019 / 09.06.2019
Weblink
https://card2brain.ch/box/20190415_ot_w7Vs
Einbinden
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20190415_ot_w7Vs/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Effects of Environment (2)

Degree of heterogeneity of sub-environments + → Degree of differentiation of subsystems

Degree of integration of subsystems required by the environment + → Degree of integration between subsystems

5.5 Critical Appraisal

-

Importance of the Theory and Practical Implications (4)

  • Draws attention to organizational context
  • Empirically testable
  • Explicit attempt to generate insights for management practice
  • Practical impact on organizational design → it changed against the backdrop of Contingency Theory

Critique of Contingency Theory (4)

  • Important environmental and structural attributes are being neglected
  • Weak explanation for adjustment of the structure of the contingencies (lack of theory)
  • Neglecting the role of power and other human factors in organizations
  • Conservative recommendations for organizational design

Summary: Contingency Theory as Organization Theory

Modul 6: Resource Dependence Theory

-

6.1 Historical Context

-

Historical Context 1970s

  • Increasingly dynamic environments
  • Increasing concentration of economic power
  • Increasing interorganizational activities

→ Empirical analysis of organization-environment relations

6.2 Environment-organization interdependence

-

Organizational Environment

Organization ends and the environment begins at that point where the organization's control over activities diminishes and the control of other organizations or individuals begins.

Three central concepts

  1. Dependence
  2. Power
  3. Interdependence

Dependence (of A on B)

  1. Directly proportional to A's motivational investment in goals mediated by B, and
  2. Inversely proportional to the availability of those goals to A outside of the A-B relation

Power (of B over A)

  1. the amount of resistance on the part of A which can be potentially overcome by B
  2. B's power over A definded as A's dependence on B

Interdependence

Mutual dependence between two parties

Types of resources (4) which an organization needs and depends on others

  • physical
  • thechnical
  • social
  • financial

the degree of dependence

  1. importance of the resource to the organization
  2. the extent to which another party has control over the resource

Two types of interdependencies

  1. Symbiotic interdependence
  2. Competitive interdependence

→ types of interdependencies often combined

Symbiotic interdependence

the output of the one (organization) is input for the other

competitive interdependence

the outcome achieved by one (organization) can only be higher if the outcome achieved by the other is lower

6.3 Strategies of Managing Interdependence

-

Core Argument of Recource Dependence Theory

Uncertainties of gaining critical resources: associated with interdependence will threaten the organization's performance and survival

→ to survive

General approaches of reducing dependencies

  • Avoiding dependencies (stockpile, form contracts, diversification)
  • Avoiding control (merger, cooptation, exchange of personnel)

Strategies of Avoiding Control: Strategies of managing symbiotic interdependencies

informal, low costs, partial solution

  • Reputation
  • Co-optation
  • Strategic alliances
  • Merger and takeover

formal, high cost, complete solution

Strategies of Avoiding Control: Strategies of managing competitive interdependencies

informal, low costs, partial solution

  • Collusion and cartels
  • Third-party linkage mechanism
  • Strategic alliances
  • Merger and takeover

formal, high cost, complete solution

6.4 Exemplary Empirical Study

-

Three types of mergers

  1. Suppliers or customers: vertical integration
  2. Competitors: horizontal expansion
  3. Organization offering other products: diversification

Suppliers or customers

Interdependence of two industries increases the likelihood that a firm in one industry merges with a firm in the other

→ symbiotic interdependencies

Competitors

Competition intensity increases the likelyhood of mergers within the same industry

→ competitive interdependencies

Organization offering other products

The more a firm relies on an unmanageable party the more likely the firm diversifies in other products

→ any interdependencies

6.5 Critical Appraisal

-

Significance of the Theory (4)

  • Conceptualization of organization-environment relations as forms of interdependence with other organizations
  • Drawing attention to inter-organizational relations
  • Articulation of the concrete strategies available to shape the environment
  • Empirically testable

Critique (3)

  • Most empirical studies were done at the industry level rather than organizational level
  • Unrealistic assumption that managers can objectively assess the value of resources
  • The wider networks of power and interdependence are ignored

Summary: Resource Dependence Theory as Organization Theory

Module 7: Organizational Ecology Theory

-

7.1 Introduction: Darwinian Evolutionary Biology

-

How does the Theory of Evolution Explain the Origin of Species?

Underlying understanding of species

  • characteristics of creatures shaped by genes
  • creatures cannot change their genes

Unit of analysis: population of creatures (defined by common gene pool)

Starting point of evolution: genes

Three Evolutionary Functions of Biology

  1. Variation: randome variation of genes → random mutation
  2. Selection: positive/negative selection of mutations → external environment ("struggle for survival")
  3. Retention: integration of selected mutation in the gene pool → inheritance

7.2 Organizational Ecology Approach

-

Research Question of the Organization Ecology Approach from Hannan and Freeman

Why are there so many kinds of organizations?

Premise of Organizational Inertia

Internal constraints:

  • informaiton system
  • "sunk costs" by investments
  • political constraints
  • culture

External constraints

  • entry and exit barriers from markets
  • limited information on environment
  • legitimacy constraints

→ Inertia impedes organizational adaptive changes

→ Inertia ensures that organizations evolve within the bounds of the population

Risks of Attempting Reorganizations

⇒ Attempts at fundamental reorganization of structures increases death rates