Strategic Management
Spring Semester 2017, Lecture by Dr. Stephan Herting, D-MTEC, ETH Zurich
Spring Semester 2017, Lecture by Dr. Stephan Herting, D-MTEC, ETH Zurich
Fichier Détails
Cartes-fiches | 52 |
---|---|
Langue | Deutsch |
Catégorie | Gestion d'entreprise |
Niveau | Université |
Crée / Actualisé | 22.05.2017 / 14.06.2018 |
Lien de web |
https://card2brain.ch/box/20170522_strategic_management
|
Intégrer |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20170522_strategic_management/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
The SECI Model of Knowledge Creation
- Tacit to Tacit (Socialization): Social interaction as tacit to tacit knowledge transfer, sharing tacit knowledge face-to-face or through experiences.
- Tacit to Explicit (Externalization): concepts, images, and written documents can support this kind of interaction. When tacit knowledge is made explicit, knowledge is crystallized, thus allowing it to be shared by others, and it becomes the basis of new knowledge.
- Explicit to Explicit (Combination): Combination (organizing, integrating knowledge), combining different types of explicit knowledge, for example building prototypes
- Explicit to Tacit (Internalization): knowledge receiving and application by an individual, enclosed by learning by doing
Knowledge can be...
individual <=> social
explicit <=> tacit.
Knowledge of a firm and how it is related to economic performance.
Combinative capabiliteis => value: The use andcombination of existingknowledge in order toinnovate
Integrative capabilities => cost: The integration ofspecialized knowledgealong the productionprocess
Protective capabilities => returns appropriation: The protection of thefirm’s knowledge, eg. Patents or Golden Handcuffs
=> economic performance
Limits of economy of sclae as entry barrier
- Trade-off with other potentially valuable barriers (eg. product differentiation)
- Technological change may penalize the large-scale fimr if their produciion is more specialized
- Commitment to achiev ecnomies of sclae by using existing technology may prevent investments in new technologies
Limits to experience as entry barrier
- The barrier can be nullfiled with new technologies and experience curves
- Pursuit of low cost through experience may involve trade-offs with other barriers (eg. product differentiation)
- If more than one fiirm erects entry barriers through experience curve, the consequences for one or more of them can be fatal
- Aggressive pursuit of cost declines through experience may draw attention away from market developments
Name typical entry barrieres
- Economies of scale
- Product differentiation
- Capital requirements
- Switching costs
- Distribution channels
- Cost disadvantage
- Government policies
Name examples of mobility barriers to switch from one strategic group to another.
- Cost of strategic change
- Organizational inertia
- Uncertain replication of strategic initiatives
- Difficulty of imitating intangible assets
Describe Utterbacks 3-Phases of Innovation Model
Phase 1: fluid pattern, high rate of innovation for products
Phase 2: transitional pattern: maximum for process innovation, rapid decline of product innovation
Phase 3: specific pattern
Characteristics of the private innovation model:
Private model:
Innovation supported by private investments and private return appropriation
Innovation encouraged through intellectual property protection
Free-revealing and uncompensated knowledge spill-over reduce innovators profits
Monopoly control granted to innovators represents a loss to society relative to free use by all of knowledge created
=> Property rights are important!
Characteristics of the collective innovation model
Collective model
Provision for public goods (non-excludable and non-rival)
Innovation encouraged through monetary, reputational or other subsidy
Free rider problem a threat to continuous innovation
Innovator relinquish control of knowledge produced, avoids social loss problem
Characteristics of private-collective (compound) model
Compound or private-collective model:
Developers use private resources to privately invest in innovation and they reveal the innovation
Innovation encouraged by private use and collective improvement
Free rider problem mediated by private rewards from collective innovation
Innovator relinquish control of knowledge produced, avoids social loss problem
Benefits from network effects not available to free riders:
Innovators gain private benefits due to free revealing if and as such free revealing causes innovations to be diffused widely
Private benefits from community participation not available to free riders
How are the three knowledge capabilities related to performance?
combinative capabilities (creating) → value
Through combining information and knowledge, market opportunities can be catched up which generates value (innovation)integrative capabilities (transferring) → cost
Productions needs coordinate efforts of specialists, efficiency is achieved by effective integration while minimizing knowledge transfer through cross-learning by organisational members. Transferring knowledge is not an efficient approach.Rules and directives regulation communications between experts
Sequencing
Routines
Group problem solving and decisions making routines
protective capabilities (managing) → returns appropriation
Protection of the firm’s knowledge
Against imitation: IP (patents, copyright, trade secrets
Incentive alignment
Employment
Reordering rewards (golden handcuffs)