Evolutionsbiologie
ETH Zürich
ETH Zürich
-
- 1 / 230
-
Flashcards
Why are females and males so different?
Sexual dimorphisms
Sexual selection
Selection on relative mating success that affects overall reproductive success; Strongest when mating opportunities limit reproductive success
Asymmetric Parental Investment
Forms of investment: sperm and ejaculate generation, egg generation, embryo & fetus carriage and nourishment, care for mate providing direct offspring care, protection and provision for born offspring; Female's reproduction should be limited number of eggs she can make or number of pregnancies; Male reproduction rate is limited by the number of mating opportunities rather than the number of sperms he can make
Sex that invests more in offspring (usually females)
Limited by resources and time, not potential mates; Should lead to greater choosiness about mates
Sex that invests less in offspring (usually males)
Limited by numb er of mates, not resources and time; Should lead to greater intra-sex competition for mates
Example: The Rough-Skinned Newt
Male give sperm, females la fertilized eggs, no parental care; For males, more mates => more offspring, not so for females
Counter-example: broad-nosed pipefish
Female deposit eggs in male pouch, males carry fertilized eggs, father provides all parental care; Relative investment is the determining factor in the forces of sexual selection, not gender
Intra-sex sexual selection
Competition among males: physical combat, sperm condition, infanticide, being sneaky
Male competition by physical combat
Male marine iguanas are larger than optimum size for natural selection; Females only mate once a year, so males try to mate with many females, males fight for female rich territories, big males win
Male competition among sperm
Females of many species give birth to offspring that have multiple fathers, Ex: squirrels, birds, lizards, spiders; Releasing more sperm when concurrents are present, tools for removing contrahent sperm, guarding mates, long copulation, transfer pheromones to render females unattractive to others
Male competition by infanticide
Male lions kill offspring of usurped males; Also reported in mice, squirrels, bears, deer, prairie dogs, foxes, fish, wasps, bees
Male competition by sneakiness
Smaller marine iguanas have fewer copulations that last long enough to reach ejaculation => Prepare ejaculation ahead and transfer during short copulation
Female choosiness
What are beneifts of being a choosy female? Ex: Widowbirds long tail feathers are costly, gray tree frogs sing long songs for females
Why should females care about differences among males?
1. The good genes hypothesis 2. Males bearing gifts, resource acquisition 3. Building on sensory wiring, pre-existing bias 4. Reinforcements of sexually selected traits: sexy sons
Males bearing gifts
Hangingflies: Females look for males with dead prey on display, big prey menas longer sex and more sperm transfer; If prey size insufficient, female moves on
Male Exploitation of female sensory bias
Basis of female preference evolves first in a nonsexual context and then males evolve in response; Water maits: Males deposit sperm on plants and then imiatte the water vibrations of a typical prey to attract females, that grab onto the males and then deposit the sperm
Female preferences being reinforced by sexy sons
Attractive males fevored by sexual selection; females with attractuve sons are favored by natural selection, because sons have more offspring; self reinforcing loop, works with any trait; Leads to runaway sexual selection
Sexual selection on females
Occurs when having more mates rather than few increases fitness; Polyandry (female mating with multiple males) is very common
Do females benefit from multiple matings?
Prairie dogs: Females with only one or two sexual partners were 8% less likely to become pregnant and give birth
Can males ever get to be choosy?
Pipefish give all parental care and are choosier about mates than females; Time is limiting factor: tunrover rate for female egg production is faste than tunrover rate for borrd care and release of the male
What about humans?
Males kill more often than females and kill more males; Asymmetric rate of violence => Males have undergone stronger sexual selection, Ex: Amazonian Yanomamö killers have more wives and offspring than non-killer, Height correlates weakly with the probability of having children among Polish men 20-50 years; In contrast intermediate height women had more children than tall or short women
Ovulation effects in humans
During ovulation, women: 1. become more attracted to men with deep voices and symmetric faces 2. are more likely to cheat 3. become more interested in going to social gatherings 4. speak at a higher pitch, change alking gait, wear more revealing clothes; Men produce more testosterone after smelling T-shirts from ovulating women than T-shirts from non-ovulating women
Intra-specific cooperation and conflict, social variation
Species, populations and individuals vary in: time spent near others, group size, degrees of interaction with others, kind of interaction with others
Social Extremes
Extremely asocial microbes: Oceanic bacteria undergoing lonely asexual fission; Extremely social microbes: stick, aggregate and work together, Myxococcus; Extremely asocial animals: meet only for sex and leave offspring to their own devices; Extremely social animals: long-term relationships, intensive parental care, costly altruism
Why live in groups?
Reasons must enhance survival and reproduction; More protection from various dangers; Access to resources unavailable to loners, ease of finding mating partners; Anti-enemy benefits, many-eyes effect, predator swamping, defense against parasites, communal defense (protection of females and prey; Foraging benefits, group hunting; Stress buffer benefits, reduced heat, moisture retention, protection from toxins (bacterial biofilm); Reduced cost of transport, pelican in V-formation with 14% lower heart rate, ducklings energy reduction by swimming in groups, fish swarms
Microbial social behaviors
Fruiting body construction: dispersion, protection from predators, wolf-pack feeding; Stationary phase growth cessation: increased longevity; Viral gene exoression during co-infection: increased host exploitation efficiency; Rhizobial nirtogen fixation: access to plant nutrients; Siderophore production; enhanced growth under iron limitation; Biofilm formation: Protection from host defences, Pathogenesis; Interference competition: Resource sequestration; Extracellular metabolism: increased local concentration of extracellular enzymes
Possible negatives of group living
Competition with other group members over resources and mates; Increased social disease transmission
Group formation
Spontaneous group formation behaviors are favored, if beneficial; Once a group exists, selection will affect how individuals behave in the group
Possible interaction behaviours
Do not interact; Interact neutrally, perforimg social acts not helping nor harming anyone; Be selfish, benefiting yourself and harming others; Be spiteful, harming yourself and others; Cooperate, benefitting yourself and others, Be altruistic: benefitting others at the cost of yourself
Problem of altruism/selfishness
How can it be maintained if it decreases the fitness of individuals that perform ist? Cooperative behavior becomes altruistic wehenever cheaters are present
Forms of altruism: Humans
Economic but non-reproductive altruism: Five self, time and money to others in a way that does not not reduce the number of children you habe or the future reproductive success of your children; Reproductive altruism: Give self, time and money to others in a way that reduces the number of children you have or the future reproductive success of your children
How is cooperation or selfishness evolutionary maintained?
Spatial structure and differential group success; Direct beneftits of ccoperaton toward kin/fellow cooperators: via spatial structuring toward kin, via kin recognition => Anti-cheater behavior/policing; 2 possible solutions: 1. Kin selection 2. Reciprocal altruism
Kin Selection
Selection favors traits that result in decreased fitness if they increase the fitness of close relatives. Relatives are more likely to share alleles that promote cooperation and altruism than are non-relatives
Hamilton's Rule
rB - C > 0; r = coefficient of relatedness, probability that homologous alleles are identical, B = fitness benefit of altruism to recipient, C = fitness cost of altruism to actor; Altruism is spreading when benefits to recipient are large, the cost to actor is low, and the two are closely related
Direct fitness, indirect fitness
Direct fitness beneifts directly to an individual expressing a cooperative trait; Indirect fitness benefits mediated through increasing fitness in relatives; Inclusive Fitness: Direct + indirect fitness
Kin selection problem
Red female squirrel helps her cousin collect food for the offspring and decreases the fitness of the red female by 0.02 and increases the ftiness of the cousin by 0.1; rB - C = -0.0075 => no inclusive benefit; Prairie dogs are more likely to give alarm calls when surrounded by close kin
Kin recognition in mice
how do organisms recognize kin to direct altruism toward them? MHC loci are highly involved in non-self recognition during pathogen invasion; Are they used in kin-recognition?; House mice discriminate between kin and non-kin by MHC glycoproteins in the urine
Aviodance of sibling cannibalism
In toads, the tadpoles can develop into omnivores/cannibals; BUT they prefer non-kin tadpoles
Eusociality
Cooperative brood care, overlapping generations within a colony of adults, division of labor into reproductive and non-reproductive groups, Ex: Ants, aphids
Cooperation among non-kin
Reciprocal altruism: altruistic behavior later returned by recipient, repeated reciprocation over time, requires recipient > actor and punishment of non-reciprocating individuals