Robin Camenzind
Cartes-fiches 31 Cartes-fiches
Utilisateurs 0 Utilisateurs
Langue English
Niveau Université
Crée / Actualisé 21.03.2014 / 03.11.2014
Attribution de licence Pas de droit d'auteur (CC0)
Lien de web
0 Réponses exactes 31 Réponses textes 0 Réponses à choix multiple


Fermer la fenêtre

Jurisdiction of the courts

Original and Appellate Jurisdiction

A court’s jurisdiction is established by its enabling Act. 
Fermer la fenêtre

Original jurisdiction

is the authority to hear a case when the case is first brought before a court. For all courts other than the High Court this will consist of original criminal and civil jurisdictions
Fermer la fenêtre

Appellate jurisdiction

is the authority of a court to hear appeals from decisions of courts of a lower level in the same court hierarchy.
Fermer la fenêtre

The High Court

Established under s 71 of the Australian Constitution. Limited original jurisdiction in those cases authorised by the Commonwealth Constitution. Appellate jurisdiction in both civil and criminal matters arising from the State Supreme Courts and Federal Courts. Appeals do not lie “as of right”. Approval to hear an appeal must first be granted by the High Court. The High Court is the final court of appeal within the Australian legal system.
Fermer la fenêtre

Functions of the High Court

The three functions of the High Court are:

To exercise a defined original jurisdiction; To guard and interpret the Australian Constitution; and To serve as the final court of appeal within the Australian legal system.
Fermer la fenêtre
Binding precedent

A decision that must be followed

Fermer la fenêtre
Persuasive precedent
A decision that may be, but need not be, followed.
Fermer la fenêtre

Ratio decidendi

The reason for deciding; that part of a judgment that is binding on later cases of similar fact
Fermer la fenêtre
Obiter Dictum
Sayings by the way
Fermer la fenêtre

Adopted or affirmed...

Adopted:  followed or applied. Affirmed: agree with the earlier decision.
Fermer la fenêtre


When a case is heard on appeal and the appellate court finds for the party who lost in the original hearing, the decision is said to be reversed. 
Fermer la fenêtre


A court over-rules a decision when it considers an earlier decision of a lower court and declares it to be no longer good law. 
Fermer la fenêtre


if the court cannot overrule a case it may state (by way of obiter) that the earlier case is no longer good law.
Fermer la fenêtre


Distinguishing occurs where material differences between the facts of two cases are argued in order to avoid the application of a binding precedent.
Fermer la fenêtre

Case Law and Statutory Interpretation

The role of the courts in interpreting legislation Principles of law developed through the interpretation of legislation, viz: When the legislation is unclear, or capable of more than one meaning, or could produce different, inconsistent results given different fact situations, the courts interpret its meaning in such as way as to resolve the difficulty. [NB: you are NOT required to know about rules of statutory interpretation ( pp.102-110) for assessment purposes.]
Fermer la fenêtre

Law defined

A set of rules, developed over a long period of time regulating people’s interactions with each other and which sets standards of conduct between individuals and other individuals, and individuals and the government and which are enforceable through sanction.

Fermer la fenêtre
Law made by Parliament 
Statute Law
Fermer la fenêtre
Law made by judges/ the courts
Case Law (sometimes referred to as Common Law)
Fermer la fenêtre

Separation of powers

The doctrine of separation of powers seeks to confine the exercise of the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government exclusively to their respective institutions (Parliament, Cabinet and the courts).
Fermer la fenêtre

Delegated Legislation

Where legislative authority has been delegated by the parliaments to government departments and authorities, and local councils Delegated legislation may include: Orders Regulations By-laws Local laws
Fermer la fenêtre

Division of law-making power

Exclusive powers Concurrent powers Residual powers
Fermer la fenêtre
Change to the balance of power between commonwealth and state governments can be achieved via:

r:text1;mso-style-textfill-fill-color:black; mso-style-textfill-fill-alpha:100.0%'>.


High Court interpretation of the Constitution Change to the Constitution Referral of Sate power to the Commonwealth
Fermer la fenêtre
To change the Constitution requires a referendum – which is set out in section 128.
Approved by an absolute majority of both Houses of Parliament or passed twice in one house. Referendum (vote) approved by majority of the voters in at least four states.

The Governor-General gives Royal Assent

Fermer la fenêtre

Case Law: law made by judges

Law developed through court hearings of disputes Includes principles: development prior to legislation governing matters not covered by legislation developed through statutory interpretation
Fermer la fenêtre

Common law

Common law is the law created by the reported decisions of judges. Common law is also known as: case law; precedent; unenacted law. The typical common law remedy is damages (monetary compensation)
Fermer la fenêtre


Equity developed as a result of the growing inflexibility and rigidity of the common law. Equity implies fairness and justice in the law. There are two types of equitable remedies sought: Injunction – a court order directing a person to stop doing something; and Specific performance – a court order directing a person to carry out an obligation.
Fermer la fenêtre

The Doctrine of Precedent

The doctrine of precedent refers to the application of original decisions in deciding later cases of similar fact 
Fermer la fenêtre

Stare decisis

– the principle that courts follow established precedents; literally means ‘to stand by a decision’.
Fermer la fenêtre

Res judicata

the principle that only the immediate parties to the action are bound.
Fermer la fenêtre

The Doctrine and ... the court hierarchy

The doctrine of precedent presupposes the existence of a court hierarchy. Underlying the doctrine of precedent is the principle that lower courts in the hierarchy stand by decisions of superior courts.