OT

OT 2019

OT 2019


S. P.
Diese Karteikarten bieten einen umfassenden Überblick über die Theorie des Neuen Institutionalismus und der Organisationsökologie auf Universitätsniveau. Sie behandeln zentrale Konzepte wie Legitimität, Institutionen, organisatorische Inertie und evolutionäre Mechanismen, wobei der Fokus auf der Struktur und dem Management von Organisationen liegt. Besonders nützlich sind sie für Studierende und Forscher, die sich mit der Analyse von Organisationen und deren Anpassung an institutionelle und technische Umgebungen beschäftigen.
Karten
182
Lernende
2
Sprache
Deutsch
Kategorie
Quizzie
Stufe
Universität
Erstellt / Aktualisiert
15.04.2019 / 09.06.2019

Lernkarten

6.2 Environment-organization interdependence

-

Organizational Environment

Organization ends and the environment begins at that point where the organization's control over activities diminishes and the control of other organizations or individuals begins.

Three central concepts

  1. Dependence
  2. Power
  3. Interdependence

Dependence (of A on B)

  1. Directly proportional to A's motivational investment in goals mediated by B, and
  2. Inversely proportional to the availability of those goals to A outside of the A-B relation

Power (of B over A)

  1. the amount of resistance on the part of A which can be potentially overcome by B
  2. B's power over A definded as A's dependence on B

Interdependence

Mutual dependence between two parties

Types of resources (4) which an organization needs and depends on others

  • physical
  • thechnical
  • social
  • financial

the degree of dependence

  1. importance of the resource to the organization
  2. the extent to which another party has control over the resource

Two types of interdependencies

  1. Symbiotic interdependence
  2. Competitive interdependence

→ types of interdependencies often combined

Symbiotic interdependence

the output of the one (organization) is input for the other

competitive interdependence

the outcome achieved by one (organization) can only be higher if the outcome achieved by the other is lower

6.3 Strategies of Managing Interdependence

-

Core Argument of Recource Dependence Theory

Uncertainties of gaining critical resources: associated with interdependence will threaten the organization's performance and survival

→ to survive

General approaches of reducing dependencies

  • Avoiding dependencies (stockpile, form contracts, diversification)
  • Avoiding control (merger, cooptation, exchange of personnel)

Strategies of Avoiding Control: Strategies of managing symbiotic interdependencies

informal, low costs, partial solution

  • Reputation
  • Co-optation
  • Strategic alliances
  • Merger and takeover

formal, high cost, complete solution

Strategies of Avoiding Control: Strategies of managing competitive interdependencies

informal, low costs, partial solution

  • Collusion and cartels
  • Third-party linkage mechanism
  • Strategic alliances
  • Merger and takeover

formal, high cost, complete solution

6.4 Exemplary Empirical Study

-

Three types of mergers

  1. Suppliers or customers: vertical integration
  2. Competitors: horizontal expansion
  3. Organization offering other products: diversification

Suppliers or customers

Interdependence of two industries increases the likelihood that a firm in one industry merges with a firm in the other

→ symbiotic interdependencies

Competitors

Competition intensity increases the likelyhood of mergers within the same industry

→ competitive interdependencies

Organization offering other products

The more a firm relies on an unmanageable party the more likely the firm diversifies in other products

→ any interdependencies

6.5 Critical Appraisal

-

Significance of the Theory (4)

  • Conceptualization of organization-environment relations as forms of interdependence with other organizations
  • Drawing attention to inter-organizational relations
  • Articulation of the concrete strategies available to shape the environment
  • Empirically testable

Critique (3)

  • Most empirical studies were done at the industry level rather than organizational level
  • Unrealistic assumption that managers can objectively assess the value of resources
  • The wider networks of power and interdependence are ignored

Summary: Resource Dependence Theory as Organization Theory

Module 7: Organizational Ecology Theory

-

7.1 Introduction: Darwinian Evolutionary Biology

-

How does the Theory of Evolution Explain the Origin of Species?

Underlying understanding of species

  • characteristics of creatures shaped by genes
  • creatures cannot change their genes

Unit of analysis: population of creatures (defined by common gene pool)

Starting point of evolution: genes

Three Evolutionary Functions of Biology

  1. Variation: randome variation of genes → random mutation
  2. Selection: positive/negative selection of mutations → external environment ("struggle for survival")
  3. Retention: integration of selected mutation in the gene pool → inheritance

7.2 Organizational Ecology Approach

-

Research Question of the Organization Ecology Approach from Hannan and Freeman

Why are there so many kinds of organizations?

Premise of Organizational Inertia

Internal constraints:

  • informaiton system
  • "sunk costs" by investments
  • political constraints
  • culture

External constraints

  • entry and exit barriers from markets
  • limited information on environment
  • legitimacy constraints

→ Inertia impedes organizational adaptive changes

→ Inertia ensures that organizations evolve within the bounds of the population

Risks of Attempting Reorganizations

⇒ Attempts at fundamental reorganization of structures increases death rates

Ecology of Organizations

Underlying concept of organization

  • organizations have a specific "blueprint" (e.g. business model)
  • organizations are inertial, they can hardly change

Unit of analysis

  • population of organizations (companies in particular)
  • (population defined by common blueprint)

Starting point of evolution: Blueprint (analogously to genes)

Evolutionary Mechanisms in Organizational Ecology

  1. Variation: new alternative blueprints → new companies
  2. Selection: positive/negative selection of new blueprints, criteria: profitability and legitimacy → market and societal environment
  3. Retention: integration and retention of selected blueprints → societal institutionalization and bureaucratic routines

1. Variation

Trigger (e.g. new technology) → new business models → startup

2. Selection

  • economic efficiency (profitability)
  • societal acceptance (legitimacy)

"From an organization ecology perspective, it is the environment which optimizes."

3. Retention

"Knowledge of previously successful forms is institutionalized in the socialization apparatus of societies - schools, families, churches, public agencies - and in cultural beliefs and values defended by dominant organizations and institutions."

7.3 Empirical Studies (exemplary)

-

Effect of Size on Organizational Failure

Hypothesis: Liability of Smallness

Small organizations have higher failure rates because of:

  • lack of reliability and legitimacy
  • difficulty of raising capital
  • problems of recruiting and training a workforce
  • higher interest payments
  • costs of compliance with regulations

Empirical Test: consistent with the argument

 

Effect of Age on Organizational Failure

Hypothesis: Liability of Newness

Young organizations ahve higher failure rates because of:

  • need to learn new roles and create routines
  • limited resources
  • lack of endorsement (legitimacy)
  • costs of compliance with regulations

Empirical test: no effect when size is controlled

Lernen