Administracion Empresarial I
Introduction in management.
Introduction in management.
-
- 1 / 113
-
Lernkarten
Vroom-Yetton-Jago: The five decision-styles available to a leader
The contingencies models of leadership (Vroom-Yetton-Jago) states that the situation determines the best style of leadership to use.
The Situational Leadership® Model states that the style of leadership used should be matched to the level of readiness of the followers.
The main proposition in contingency approaches is that the effectiveness of a given leadership style is contingent on the situation, implying that certain leader behaviours will be effective in some situations but not in others.
Contingency approaches
Emphasizes that what managers do in practice depends on, or is contingent upon, a given set of circumstances or situation.
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory
The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership
Theory of leadership that suggests that the primary activities of a leader are to make desirable and achievable rewards available to organization members who attain organizational goals and to clarify the kinds of behavior that must be performed to earn those rewards.
Der Führungsstil kann von den persönlichen Eigenschaften nicht komplett getrennt werden, da Persönlichkeit stark mit Führungsfähigkeit zusammenhängt. Dies hat letztlich zur Folge, dass eine Führungskraft im Modell Fiedlers nur schwer für neue Situationen ausgebildet werden kann. Vielmehr legt Fiedlers Modell nahe, die entsprechende Situation so lange zu verändern, bis sie auf die jeweilige Führungskraft und deren Führungsstileigenschaften passt. Hierfür hat sich die Kurzformel „engineer the job" herausgebildet.
Fiedler betrachtet zwei interagierende Faktoren: Den „Führungsstil" und die „Günstigkeit der Situation". Letztere ist abhängig von drei Variablen: der Führer-Mitarbeiter-Beziehung, der „Aufgabenstruktur" und der „Positionsmacht des Führers". Diese Variablen werden miteinander kombiniert, wodurch sich insgesamt acht mögliche Situationen ergeben. Anhand des zuvor ermittelten LPC-Wertes (least preferred co-worker), lässt sich jetzt in jeder Situation der Grad der Aufgabenorientierung (niedriger LPC-Wert) oder der Mitarbeiterorientierung (hoher LPC-Wert) bestimmen. Je nach Situation korreliert die Gruppenleistung entweder positiv oder negativ mit dem LPC-Wert.
Durch empirische Untersuchungen konnte Fiedler feststellen, dass in besonders günstigen und in besonders ungünstigen Führungssituationen ein aufgabenorientierter Führungsstil zu höherem Erfolg führt, während sich in Situationen mittlerer Günstigkeit der personenorientierte Führungsstil besser eigene.
The Michigan Studies
Found three critical characteristics of effective leading.
Task-oriented behavior
Effective managers studied did not do the same kind work as their subordinates. Their tasks were different, and included planning and scheduling work, coordinating activities and providing necessary resources.
They also spent time guiding subordinates in setting task goals that were both challenging and achievable.
Relationship-oriented behavior
Effective managers not only concentrated on the task, but also on their relationship with their subordinates. They were more considerate, helpful and supportive of subordinates, including helping them with their career and personal problems. They recognized effort with intrinsic as well as extrinsic reward, thanking people for effort.
Overall, the effective preferred a general and hands-off form of supervision rather than close control. They set goals and provided guidelines, but then gave their subordinates plenty of leeway as to how the goals would be achieved.
Participative leadership
Effective leaders use a participative style, managing at the group level as well as individually, for example using team meetings to share ideas and involve the team in group decisions and problem-solving. By their actions, such leaders model good team-oriented behavior.
The role of the manager is more facilitative than directive, guiding the conversation and helping to resolve differences. The manager, however, is responsible for results and is not absolved of responsibility. As such, they may make final decisions that take recommendations from the team into account.
The effect of participative leadership is to build a cohesive team which works together rather than a set of individuals.
The Michigan studies added 'Participative leadership' to the Ohio findings, moving the debate further into the question of leading teams rather than just individuals.
Likert
Likert summarized his findings in elaborating 4 systems of management
System I
- Exploitative authoritative type
- Managers use fear and threats
- Communication downwards
- Decisions downwards
System II
- Patriarchal system
- Decisions within a prescribed framework may be delegated to lower levels
- Managers use rewards to motivate
System III
- Consultative type
- Management uses rewards, occasional punishment
- Communication down and up
- Broad company decisions at top level, more specific decisions at lower levels
System IV
- Participative group management
- Communication in every direction
- Decision-making through group process
- Flat hierarchy
- System 4 management produces high productivity, greater involvement of individuals and better labor-management relations
Transformational leadership
Transformational leadership is leadership that inspires organizational success by profoundly affecting followers’ belief in what an organization should be, as well as their values, such as justice and integrity.
Transformational leaders inspire others with their vision, often promote this vision over opposition, and demonstrate confidence in themselves and their views.
4 I-s for Transformational Leadership :
- Idealized influence;
- Inspirational motivation;
- Intellectually stimulating;
- Individual consideration.
Common characteristics of Transformational Leaders (see picture)
Superleadership
Is leadership that inspires organizational success by showing followers how to lead themselves.
The goal is to develop employees who are productive, work independently and need only minimal attention from the superleader.
Coaching
Coaching is leadership that instructs followers on how to meet the special organizational challenges they face.
Characteristics of an effective coach
- Empathy (putting oneself in other person’s shoes)
- Listening skill
- Insight into people
- Patience toward people
- Concern for welfare of people
- Minimum hostility toward people
- Self-confidence and emotional stability
- Noncompetitiveness with team members
- Enthusiasm for people
Entrepreneurial leadership
Is leadership that is based on the attitude that the leader is self-employed.
Leaders of this type act as if the are playing a critical role in the organization -> as if their department was their organization. They approach each mistake as if it were a significant error rather than a smaller error that will be neutralized by the normal functioning of the organization.
Max Weber
There are three types of organization’s leadership
Charismatic
The authority is based on the inspiration of a leader, the charismatic leader. This organizations tend to be very unstable in case the leader disappears.
Traditional
Authority based on “how it has always been” (not on expertise, selection process or whatever).
Rational-legal
Bureaucratic organizational form. Authority based on “contribution to the machine (company). Most efficient form of organization because it represents the final stage of depersonalization. Clear separation of personal and business affairs.
Providing efficiency and regularity leads to a stable system, instead of people based unefficency.
Weber has made the first attempt to produce systematic categories for organizational analysis.
Motivation: Definition
Motivation according to Samuel Certo
Motivation is the inner state that causes an individual to behave in a way that ensures the accomplishment of some goal.
Needs Theories - Definition
Needs Theories: What needs people are trying to satisfy at work and what outcomes will satisfy those needs.
Frederick Herzberg
Main factors that lead to job satisfaction
- Achievement
- Recognition
- Attraction of the work itself
- Responsibility
- Advancement
Lack of these factors very rarely reason for dissatisfaction
Main factors that lead to job dissatisfaction
- Company policy
- Supervision
- Salary
- Interpersonal relations
- Many different factors, not as for satisfaction
- Not opposites to one other: regard two different ranges of human needs
- Hygiene factors: required in order to be not dissatisfied, but don’t lead to satisfaction. Relate to the physical and psychological context of the work—comfortable work environment, pay, job security.
- Motivation factors: absence doesn’t lead to dissatisfaction, just absence of satisfaction. Relate to the nature of the work itself—autonomy, responsibility, interesting work.
McClelland
Need for Achievement
A strong need to perform challenging tasks well and meet personal standards for excellence
Need for Affiliation
A concern for good interpersonal relations, being liked, and getting along
Need for Power
A desire to control or influence others
McGregor
Characterization of Theory X
- Average human avoids work if possible
- Management needs to stress productivity, introduce incentive schemes
- People must be controlled, directed, threatened with punishment to reach organizational goals
- The average human being prefers to be directed
Characterization of Theory Y
- People do not simply dislike work, it’s a natural part of life
- People will exercise self-direction and self-control in the service of objectives to which they are committed
- Satisfying the individuals “self-actualizing needs” is the most significant reward to be offered to obtain commitment
- More people are able to contribute to organizational problems than do so
- At the present situation, potentialities of the average person are not fully used
Chris Argyris’ maturity-inmaturity
According to Argyris, as people naturally progress from immaturity to maturity, they move from a state of total passivity as an infant, to full control of self as an adult in 7 stages.
As they mature, they have increasing needs for more activity, enjoy a state of relative independence, behave in many different ways, have deeper and more lasting interests, etc.
Adam’s Equity Theory
Focuses on people’s perceptions of the fairness (or lack of fairness) of their work outcomes in proportion to their work inputs.
A relative outcome to input ratio comparison to oneself or to another person (referent) perceived as similar to oneself.
Equity exists when a person perceives that their outcome/input ratio to be equal to the referent’s ratio.
If the referent receives more outcomes, they should also give more inputs to achieve equity.
Victor Vroom
Expectancy
A person's perceptiono about the extent to which his or her effor will result in a certain level of performance.
Instrumentality
A person's perception about the extent to which performance at a certain level will result in the attainment of outcomes
Valence
How desirable each of the outcomes available from a job or organization is to a person.
The Porter-Lawler Theory of Motivation
Assumptions:
If performance in an organization results in equitable and fair rewards, people will be more satisfied.
High performance can lead to rewards and high satisfaction.
There could be 2 Types of rewards:
Extrinsic rewards—outcomes set and awarded by external parties (e.g., pay and promotions).
Intrinsic rewards—outcomes that are internal to the individual (e.g., self-esteem and feelings of accomplishment).
Organizational chart, Flat / Tall - Definitions
Organizational chart: A chart that shows how a firm is structured and who is in charge of whom -> shows the formal organization.
A flat organization chart is an organization chart characterized by few levels and a relatively broad span of management.
A tall organization chart is an organization chart characterized by many levels and a relatively narrow span of management.
Fayol’s guidelines for organizing resources
- Judiciously prepare and execute the operating plan
- Organize the human and the material facets so that they are consistent with objectives, resources and requirements of the concern
- Establish a single competent, energetic guiding authority (formal management structure)
- Coordinate all activities and efforts
- Formulate clear, distinct and precise decisions
- Arrange for efficient selection so that each department is headed by a competent, energetic manager and all employees are placed where they can render the greatest service
- Define duties
- Encourage initiative and responsibility
- Offer fair and suitable rewards for services rendered
- Make use of sanctions against faults and errors
- Maintain discipline
- Ensure that individual interests are consistent with the general interests of the organization
- Recognize the unity of command
- Promote both material and human coordination
- Institute and effect controls
- Avoid regulations, red tape and paperwork
The organizing process
- Reflect on plans and objectives
- Establish major tasks
- Divide major tasks into subtasks
- Allocate resources and directives for subtasks
- Evaluate the results of implemented strategy
- repeat continuously!
Vertical hierarchy & horizontal specialization
The Vertical Hierarchy of Authority: shows the chain of command.
The Horizontal Specialization: shows the different jobs or horizontal division of work and work specialization.
Graicunas’ formula on span-of-management
Graicunas’ formula on span-of-management shows that as the number of a manager’s subordinates increases arithmetically, the number of possible relationships among the manager and the subordinates increases geometrically.
gangplank - definition
A gangplank (Fayol) is a communication channel extending from one organizational division to another but not shown in the lines of communication outlined on an organizational chart.
Definitions - Authority, Accountability, Responsibility, Delegation, Division of Labour, Coordination
Authority refers to the rights inherent in a managerial position to make decisions, give orders, and utilize resources.
Accountability managers must report and justify work results to managers above them –> managers are held liable for how well they use their authority or live up to their responsibility of performing predetermined activities.
Responsibility is the obligation you have to perform the tasks assigned to you.
Delegation is the process of assigning managerial authority and responsibility to managers and employees lower in the hierarchy.
Division of labor is the assignment of various portions of a particular task among a number of organization members. Division of labor calls for specialization.
Coordination is the orderly arrangement of group effort to provide unity of action in the pursuit of a common purpose. It involves encouraging the completion of individual portions of a task in an appropriate, synchronized order.
Definitions - Line Manager, Staff personnel, Line authority, Staff authority, Functional authority
Line Managers have authority to make decisions and usually have people reporting to them.
Staff Personnel have authority functions; they provide advice, recommendations, and research to line managers.
Line authority is based on a direct chain of command from the top level of authority through each successive level of the organization.
Staff authority is the right to advise or assist those who possess line authority.
Functional authority is the right of individuals to exercise a limited form of authority over the specialized functions for which they are responsible.
Conflicts between line and staff personnel
- According to line personnel
- Staff tend to assume line authority
- Do not give sound advice
- Steal credif for success
- fail to keep line personnel informed of other activities
- Do not see the whole picture
- According to staff personnel
- Line personnel do not make proper use of staff personnel
- Resist new ideas
- Refuse to give staff personnel enough authority
Functional organization - adv. / disadv.
Advantages
- Traditional / proven
- Department can be staffed by experts
- Supervision is facilitated
- Coordination within department is easier
Disadvantages
- Decision making becomes slow and bureaucratic
- Lose sight of organizational goals/issues
- Accountability and performance are difficult to monitor
Divisional structure - adv. / disadv.
Advantages
- Activities with one product can be integrated
- Speed and effectiveness of decision making
- Performance of these individual products can be assessed
Disadvantages
- Focus on product at the exclusion of the rest of the organization
- Administrative costs may increase
contingency design - definition
Contingency Design is the process of fitting the organization to the environment (finding the best structure for the environment).
The main factors for choosing the right structure are
- Size
- Culture
- Technology
- Environment
- Goals & strategies