Computational Science Investigation of Material Mechanics
ETHZ / Master Course in Civil Engineering / FS2022 / exam questions
ETHZ / Master Course in Civil Engineering / FS2022 / exam questions
Kartei Details
Karten | 65 |
---|---|
Sprache | English |
Kategorie | Statik |
Stufe | Universität |
Erstellt / Aktualisiert | 13.10.2022 / 17.01.2023 |
Lizenzierung | Keine Angabe |
Weblink |
https://card2brain.ch/box/20221013_computational_science_investigation_of_material_mechanics
|
Einbinden |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20221013_computational_science_investigation_of_material_mechanics/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
What is the job of a forensic civil engineer?
A forensic engineer investigates the cause for unacceptable performance (e.g. collapse) of a structure.
Key tasks are:
- collect evidence
- analyze evidence
- establish failure hypothesis
- validate/reject failure hypothesis
- conclude and report
Describe the typical failure investigation procedure
1. Define the failure
2. Collect the evidence
3. Analyze the evidence
4. Establish possible root causes for the failure
5. Validate the hypothesis through structural analysis
6. Arrive at a conclusion regarding the cause(s)
7. Prepare the final report
What are the key differences in terms of assumptions in the processes of designing a structure and analyzing the failure of a structure?
Objective:
- Forensic: determine root cause for structural failure (Inverse problem)
- Design: make plans to build a structure (Forward problem)
Assumptions vs Evidence:
- Forensic: uses evidence to test various failure hypotheses
- Design: needs assumptions to design
Based on evidence --> tries to guess what happened
Based on assumptions --> tries to guess what is going to happen
Give root causes for failure
(45-55%) Design errors
(20-30%) Construction defects
(5-10%) Material deterioration / maintenance
Catastrophic events or overload
Human Factors for Failures:
- Negligence: Disregard of codes
- Incompetence: Failure to understand fundamental principles
- Ignorance: Failure to follow design and construction doc
- Greed: Intentional disregard of requirements and safe practice
- Disorganization: Failure to establish clear responsibilities
- Miscommunication: Failure to communicate between parties
- Group thinking: based on a common desire not to upset the balance of a group of people
- Misuse, abuse, neglect: Use and operation beyond its intent; lack of maintenance
Give an example, where material fatigue resulted in catastrophic failure
Genua brücke
What are the differences at the material level when studying structural performance compared to structural failure?
Use actual values for geometry, material, and load instead of design values.
For design, you aim to remain below a critical value --> which results in mostly linear behavior
For failure, you need to determine what happens beyond this critical value --> highly non-linear
Describe the typical process of developing a model
1. Physical problem statement: describe the physical properties to model
2. Mathematical problem statement: translate the physics into mathematics to solve it
3. (Numerical) Solution of problem: find the exact or approximate solution to the problem
Then evaluate the model (e.g. compare it to actual data) and refine it if required.
Once we have a problem statement, what are the different possibilities to find a solution?
Analytical or numerical (approximate) solutions.