Steel Structures III - Advanced Steel and Composite Construction
ETHZ / Civil Engineering Master / Major in Structural Engineering / Autumn Semester 2022Lectures: A. Taras, U. Angst
ETHZ / Civil Engineering Master / Major in Structural Engineering / Autumn Semester 2022Lectures: A. Taras, U. Angst
Kartei Details
Karten | 46 |
---|---|
Sprache | English |
Kategorie | Statik |
Stufe | Universität |
Erstellt / Aktualisiert | 28.12.2022 / 29.07.2023 |
Lizenzierung | Keine Angabe |
Weblink |
https://card2brain.ch/box/20221228_steel_structures_iii_advanced_steel_and_composite_construction
|
Einbinden |
<iframe src="https://card2brain.ch/box/20221228_steel_structures_iii_advanced_steel_and_composite_construction/embed" width="780" height="150" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe>
|
Advantages of Composite beams
- large spans possible
- short erection times (joints as in steel construction)
- large stiffness with low weight
- --> floor depth can be optimized
- --> foundation costs reduced
- simple introduction of web openings for the passing of installation
Common applications of Composite beams
- Office buildings, hotels
- industrial buildings, parking decks
- schools, airports, sports facilities
- abroad increased use in residential structures
--> see advantages!
Effective width
Consideration of the "shear lag" effect
Plane-section hypothesis is not fulfilled in very wide slabs --> "lag" of outer parts
Used only when modeling composite elements with beam elements
(not needed if slab modeled separately as a shell!)
Effect is covered by reducing the width \(b_e\) included in the stiffness and stress calculations:
- stiffness and maximum stresses of the beam composite section are approximately equivalent
- strictly valid for bending effects:
difficulties arise when sections are subjected to bending and axial forces
--> would require two different widths
Cross-section analysis of composite beams
Elastic calculation - n-factor analysis:
Use: structural analysis and CS verification for E-E method
Plastic CS-calculation - "stress blocks" in steel and concrete:
Use: CS of classes that allow for use of E-P or P-P
Plastic calculation of composite beam cross-sections
Use: CS of classes E-P or P-P --> usually building construction, rarely bridges
Simplification:
fully plastic bending capacities --> "stress blocks"
Depending on the position of the plastic neutral axis there are 3 cases to be distinguished
Calculation of \(M_{pl,Rd}\):
- iterative determination of the plastic neutral axis
from equilibrium in the longitudinal direction
- calculate \(M_{pl,Rd}\) with the equilibrium of moments
How to determine the position of the plastic neutral axis
3 cases:
- A: axis is in the slab
- B. axis is in the upper flange
- C: axis is in the web
Determination:
- Usually, case A is assumed first
- if the geometric requirements are not met, case B is checked
- if the plastic zero line is finally found to be in the web, case C
Case C is rarely relevant for "classical" composite beams
but is the usual case for "slim floor" beams
Load level \(q_1\)
- first reaching of concrete bending strength
- reduction of bending stiffness over support
- start of moment redistribution
Load level \(q_2\)
- yield strength of structural steel reached near intermediate support \(\sigma_{s} = f_{sy}\)
- partially plastic zones
Load level \(q_3\)
- CS reached plastic capacity at support
--> moment at support = \(M_{pl,Rd}^{-}\) - plastic hinge formation
Load level \(q_4\)
- CS reaches plastic capacity in spans \(M_{pl,Rd}^{+}\)
- kinematic mechanism --> collapse